[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230504024157.GB650928@mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 22:41:57 -0400
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
syzbot+4a03518df1e31b537066@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Fix data races when using cached status extents
On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 08:21:28PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> When using cached extent stored in extent status tree in tree->cache_es
> another process holding ei->i_es_lock for reading can be racing with us
> setting new value of tree->cache_es. If the compiler would decide to
> refetch tree->cache_es at an unfortunate moment, it could result in a
> bogus in_range() check. Fix the possible race by using READ_ONCE() when
> using tree->cache_es only under ei->i_es_lock for reading.
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+4a03518df1e31b537066@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/000000000000d3b33905fa0fd4a6@google.com
> Suggested-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Don't we also need a WRITE_ONCE here?
diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
index 7bc221038c6c..4694582cf255 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static void __es_find_extent_range(struct inode *inode,
}
if (es1 && matching_fn(es1)) {
- tree->cache_es = es1;
+ WRITE_ONCE(tree->cache_es, es1);
es->es_lblk = es1->es_lblk;
es->es_len = es1->es_len;
es->es_pblk = es1->es_pblk;
- Ted
Powered by blists - more mailing lists