linux-ext4 - Re: 6.4-rc1 xfstests-bld adv regressions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230509190930.wyblxwohejmd43fw@quack3>
Date:   Tue, 9 May 2023 21:09:30 +0200
From:   Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:     Eric Whitney <enwlinux@...il.com>
Cc:     jack@...e.cz, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 6.4-rc1 xfstests-bld adv regressions

Hi Eric!

On Tue 09-05-23 14:20:15, Eric Whitney wrote:
> I'm seeing two test regressions on 6.4-rc1 while running the adv test case
> with kvm-xfstests.  Both tests fail with 100% reliability in 100 trial runs,
> and the failures appear to depend solely upon the fast commit mount option.
> 
> The first is generic/065, where the relevant info from 065.full is:
> 
> _check_generic_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/vdc is inconsistent
> *** fsck.ext4 output ***
> fsck from util-linux 2.36.1
> e2fsck 1.47.0 (5-Feb-2023)
> Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
> Pass 2: Checking directory structure
> Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
> Pass 4: Checking reference counts
> Pass 5: Checking group summary information
> Directories count wrong for group #16 (4294967293, counted=0).
> 
> 
> The second is generic/535, where the test output is:
> 
>      QA output created by 535
>      Silence is golden
>     +Before: 755
>     +After : 777
> 
> Both test failures bisect to:  e360c6ed7274 ("ext4: Drop special handling of
> journalled data from ext4_sync_file()").  Reverting this patch eliminates the
> test failures.  So, I thought I'd bring these to your attention.

Thanks for report! Yeah, when doing commit e360c6ed7274 I forgot about
directories which can be also fsynced and which need special treatment. I
have to think a bit what's the best way to fix this.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR