linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] ext4: Reduce time overhead for replacing xattr values.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHB1NajWfFXWuO=Hh6TQiXise+_zp1EunXZML1vWVmqy4OJVbg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 9 May 2023 12:38:54 +0800
From:   JunChao Sun <sunjunchao2870@...il.com>
To:     tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca
Cc:     jack@...e.cz, tahsin@...gle.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Reduce time overhead for replacing xattr values.

JunChao Sun <sunjunchao2870@...il.com> 于2023年5月9日周二 09:10写道：
>
> When replace the value of xattr which found in an ea_inode, currently
> ext4 will evict ea_inode which stores the old value, recreate an
> ea_inode and then write the new value into new ea_inode. This can
> be optimized by writing the new value into old ea_inode directly.
>
> The logic for replacing the value of xattr without this patch
> is as follows:
> ext4_xattr_set_entry()
>   ->ext4_xattr_inode_iget(&old_ea_inode)
>   ->ext4_xattr_inode_lookup_create(&new_ea_inode)
>   ->ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref(old_ea_inode)
>   ->iput(old_ea_inode)
>       ->ext4_destroy_inode()
>       ->ext4_evict_inode()
>       ->ext4_free_inode()
>   ->iput(new_ea_inode)
>
> The logic with this patch is:
> ext4_xattr_set_entry()
>   ->ext4_xattr_inode_iget(&old_ea_inode)
>   ->ext4_xattr_inode_write(old_ea_inode, new_value)
>   ->iput(old_ea_inode)
>
> This patch reduces the time it takes to replace xattr in ext4.
> Without this patch, replacing the value of xattr two million times takes
> about 45 seconds on Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 platform.
> With this patch, the same operation takes only 6 seconds.
>
> [root@...ent01 sjc]# ./mount.sh
> /dev/sdb1 contains a ext4 file system
>     last mounted on /mnt/ext4 on Mon May  8 17:05:38 2023
> [root@...ent01 sjc]# touch /mnt/ext4/file1
> [root@...ent01 sjc]# gcc test.c
> [root@...ent01 sjc]# time ./a.out
>
> real    0m45.248s
> user    0m0.513s
> sys 0m39.231s
>
> [root@...ent01 sjc]# ./mount.sh
> /dev/sdb1 contains a ext4 file system
>     last mounted on /mnt/ext4 on Mon May  8 17:08:20 2023
> [root@...ent01 sjc]# touch /mnt/ext4/file1
> [root@...ent01 sjc]# time ./a.out
>
> real    0m5.977s
> user    0m0.316s
> sys 0m5.659s
>
> The test.c and mount.sh are in [1].
> This patch passed the tests with xfstests using 'check -g quick'.
>
> [1]: https://gist.github.com/sjc2870/c923d7fa627d10ab65d6c305afb02cdb
>
> Signed-off-by: JunChao Sun <sunjunchao2870@...il.com>
> ---
>  fs/ext4/xattr.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/xattr.c b/fs/ext4/xattr.c
> index d57408cbe903..37f79594ac70 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/xattr.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/xattr.c
> @@ -1713,6 +1713,39 @@ static int ext4_xattr_set_entry(struct ext4_xattr_info *i,
>                 }
>         }
>
> +       if (!s->not_found && i->value && here->e_value_inum && i->in_inode) {
> +               /* Replace xattr value in ea_inode in place */
> +               int size_diff = i->value_len - le32_to_cpu(here->e_value_size);
> +
> +               ret = ext4_xattr_inode_iget(inode,
> +                                               le32_to_cpu(here->e_value_inum),
> +                                               le32_to_cpu(here->e_hash),
> +                                               &old_ea_inode);
> +               if (ret) {
> +                       old_ea_inode = NULL;
> +                       goto out;
> +               }
>
> > +               if (size_diff > 0)
> > +                       ret = ext4_xattr_inode_alloc_quota(inode, size_diff);
> > +               else if (size_diff < 0)
> > +                       ext4_xattr_inode_free_quota(inode, NULL, -size_diff);
> > +               if (ret)
> > +                       goto out;
> > +
> > +               ret = ext4_xattr_inode_write(handle, old_ea_inode, i->value, i->value_len);
> > +               if (ret) {
> > +                       if (size_diff > 0)
> > +                               ext4_xattr_inode_free_quota(inode, NULL, size_diff);
> > +                       else if (size_diff < 0)
> > +                               ret = ext4_xattr_inode_alloc_quota(inode, -size_diff);
> > +                       goto out;
> > +               }
Here might missed a judgment condition: if
(ext4_xattr_inodee_get_ref(old_ea_inode) == 1). I will send patch v2
to fix this.

> +               here->e_value_size = cpu_to_le32(i->value_len);
> +               new_ea_inode = old_ea_inode;
> +               old_ea_inode = NULL;
> +               goto update_hash;
> +       }
> +
>         /*
>          * Getting access to old and new ea inodes is subject to failures.
>          * Finish that work before doing any modifications to the xattr data.
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>