[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <878rdn5uct.fsf@doe.com>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 12:15:38 +0530
From: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@...il.com>
To: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>,
Disha Goel <disgoel@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/5] ext4: Call fsverity_verify_folio()
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org> writes:
> Now that fsverity supports working on entire folios, call
> fsverity_verify_folio() instead of fsverity_verify_page()
Thanks for catching it.
>
> Reported-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
> ---
> fs/ext4/readpage.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
I agree that we could use fsverity_verify_folio() instead of
fsverity_verify_page() here.
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@...il.com>
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/readpage.c b/fs/ext4/readpage.c
> index 6f46823fba61..3e7d160f543f 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/readpage.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/readpage.c
> @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ int ext4_mpage_readpages(struct inode *inode,
> folio_size(folio));
> if (first_hole == 0) {
> if (ext4_need_verity(inode, folio->index) &&
> - !fsverity_verify_page(&folio->page))
> + !fsverity_verify_folio(folio))
> goto set_error_page;
> folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
> folio_unlock(folio);
> --
> 2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists