lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZGeKm+jcBxzkMXQs@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 May 2023 10:41:31 -0400
From:   Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...nel.org>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     Sarthak Kukreti <sarthakkukreti@...omium.org>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
        Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
        Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
        Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@...gle.com>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] Introduce provisioning primitives

On Fri, May 19 2023 at 12:09P -0400,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:

> FYI, I really don't think this primitive is a good idea.  In the
> concept of non-overwritable storage (NAND, SMR drives) the entire
> concept of a one-shoot 'provisioning' that will guarantee later writes
> are always possible is simply bogus.

Valid point for sure, such storage shouldn't advertise support (and
will return -EOPNOTSUPP).

But the primitive still has utility for other classes of storage.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ