[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJfpegtHb4pA=1NBRzQJSub7B0HZqnvqsMNQmYYM-8L7PTQfvw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 16:19:38 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna@...nel.org>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
"open list:F2FS FILE SYSTEM" <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
cluster-devel@...hat.com, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] fs: factor out a direct_write_fallback helper
On Fri, 19 May 2023 at 11:36, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
>
> Add a helper dealing with handling the syncing of a buffered write fallback
> for direct I/O.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> ---
> fs/libfs.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/fs.h | 2 ++
> mm/filemap.c | 59 ++++++++++------------------------------------
> 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/libfs.c b/fs/libfs.c
> index 89cf614a327158..9f3791fc6e0715 100644
> --- a/fs/libfs.c
> +++ b/fs/libfs.c
> @@ -1613,3 +1613,39 @@ u64 inode_query_iversion(struct inode *inode)
> return cur >> I_VERSION_QUERIED_SHIFT;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(inode_query_iversion);
> +
> +ssize_t direct_write_fallback(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
> + ssize_t direct_written, ssize_t buffered_written)
> +{
> + struct address_space *mapping = iocb->ki_filp->f_mapping;
> + loff_t pos = iocb->ki_pos, end;
At this point pos will point after the end of the buffered write (as
per earlier patches), yes?
> + int err;
> +
> + /*
> + * If the buffered write fallback returned an error, we want to return
> + * the number of bytes which were written by direct I/O, or the error
> + * code if that was zero.
> + *
> + * Note that this differs from normal direct-io semantics, which will
> + * return -EFOO even if some bytes were written.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(buffered_written < 0))
> + return buffered_written;
> +
> + /*
> + * We need to ensure that the page cache pages are written to disk and
> + * invalidated to preserve the expected O_DIRECT semantics.
> + */
> + end = pos + buffered_written - 1;
So this calculation is wrong.
AFAICS this affects later patches as well.
Thanks,
Miklos
Powered by blists - more mailing lists