linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 14/17] block: open code __generic_file_write

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZG6OTWckNlz+P+mo@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date:   Wed, 24 May 2023 15:23:09 -0700
From:   Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...sung.com>,
        Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>,
        Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/17] block: open code __generic_file_write_iter for
 blkdev writes

On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 07:49:23AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Open code __generic_file_write_iter to remove the indirect call into
> ->direct_IO and to prepare using the iomap based write code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> ---
>  block/fops.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/fops.c b/block/fops.c
> index b670aa7c5bb745..fd510b6142bd57 100644
> --- a/block/fops.c
> +++ b/block/fops.c
> @@ -508,6 +508,29 @@ static int blkdev_close(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static ssize_t
> +blkdev_direct_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
> +{
> +	size_t count = iov_iter_count(from);
> +	ssize_t written;
> +
> +	written = kiocb_invalidate_pages(iocb, count);
> +	if (written) {
> +		if (written == -EBUSY)
> +			return 0;
> +		return written;
> +	}
> +
> +	written = blkdev_direct_IO(iocb, from);
> +	if (written > 0) {
> +		kiocb_invalidate_post_write(iocb, count);
> +		iocb->ki_pos += written;
> +	}

Written can be negative here after blkdev_direct_IO()

> +	if (written != -EIOCBQUEUED)
> +		iov_iter_revert(from, count - written - iov_iter_count(from));

And we'll then use it here on iov_iter_revert() and this can crash on
with some values. For example this can crash on a 4k write attempt
on a 32k drive when experimenting wit large block sizes.

kernel BUG at lib/iov_iter.c:999!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
CPU: 4 PID: 949 Comm: fio Not tainted 6.3.0-large-block-20230426-dirty#28
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS
1.16.0-debian-1.16.0-5        04/01/2014
+RIP: 0010:iov_iter_revert.part.0+0x16e/0x170
Code: f9 40 a2 63 af 74 07 03 56 08 89 d8 29 d0 89 45 08 44 89 6d 20
<etc>
RSP: 0018:ffffaa52006cfc60 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000016 RBX: 0000000000000016 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000004 RSI: 0000000000000006 RDI: ffffaa52006cfd08
RBP: ffffaa52006cfd08 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffaa52006cfb40
R10: 0000000000000003 R11: ffffffffafcc21e8 R12: 0000000000004000
R13: 0000000000003fea R14: ffff9de3d7565e00 R15: ffff9de3c1f68600
FS:  00007f8bfe726c40(0000) GS:ffff9de43bd00000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f8bf5eadd68 CR3: 0000000102c76001 CR4: 0000000000770ee0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
PKRU: 55555554
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
blkdev_direct_write+0xf0/0x160
blkdev_write_iter+0x11b/0x230
io_write+0x10c/0x420
? kmem_cache_alloc_bulk+0x2a1/0x410
? fget+0x79/0xb0
io_issue_sqe+0x60/0x3b0
? io_prep_rw+0x5a/0x190
io_submit_sqes+0x1e6/0x640
__do_sys_io_uring_enter+0x54c/0xb90
? handle_mm_fault+0x9a/0x340
? preempt_count_add+0x47/0xa0
? up_read+0x37/0x70
? do_user_addr_fault+0x27c/0x780
do_syscall_64+0x37/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hw

Although I fixed it with an early check on this routine
with:

if (count < bdev_logical_block_size(bdev))
	return -EINVAL; 

I think this can just be fixed by also using the alignment
check earier here:

if (blkdev_dio_unaligned(bdev, pos, iter))                               
	return -EINVAL;  

  Luis