linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] ext4: Remove ext4 locking of moved directory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230601-vierhundert-fuhrpark-1d29c6cc1ed7@brauner>
Date:   Thu, 1 Jun 2023 17:58:19 +0200
From:   Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc:     Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] ext4: Remove ext4 locking of moved directory

On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 05:27:46PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 01-06-23 10:52:22, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 12:58:21PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > Remove locking of moved directory in ext4_rename2(). We will take care
> > > of it in VFS instead. This effectively reverts commit 0813299c586b
> > > ("ext4: Fix possible corruption when moving a directory") and followup
> > > fixes.
> > 
> > Remind me --- commit 0813299c586b is not actually causing any
> > problems; it's just not fully effective at solving the problem.  Is
> > that correct?
> 
> Yes, correct.
> 
> > In other words, is there a rush in trying to get this revert to Linus
> > during this cycle as a regression fix?
> > 
> > I think the answer is no, and we can just let this full patch series
> > go in via the vfs branch during the next merge window, but I just
> > wanted to make sure.
> 
> Exactly, that's my plan as well.

Yeah, we'll have time and ideally this should soak in -next for a good
while also gives others time to take a look.