[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZJNHoWGqkVEVStXz@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 19:55:29 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Jeremy Bongio <bongiojp@...il.com>
Cc: Ted Tso <tytso@....edu>, "Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@...cle.com>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] For DIO writes with no mapped pages for inode, skip
deferring completion.
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 10:29:20AM -0700, Jeremy Bongio wrote:
> +++ b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> @@ -168,7 +168,9 @@ void iomap_dio_bio_end_io(struct bio *bio)
> struct task_struct *waiter = dio->submit.waiter;
> WRITE_ONCE(dio->submit.waiter, NULL);
> blk_wake_io_task(waiter);
> - } else if (dio->flags & IOMAP_DIO_WRITE) {
> + } else if (dio->flags & IOMAP_DIO_WRITE &&
> + (!dio->iocb->ki_filp->f_inode ||
> + dio->iocb->ki_filp->f_inode->i_mapping->nrpages))) {
I don't think it's possible for file->f_inode to be NULL here, is it?
At any rate, that amount of indirection is just nasty. How about this?
+++ b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
@@ -161,15 +161,19 @@ void iomap_dio_bio_end_io(struct bio *bio)
struct task_struct *waiter = dio->submit.waiter;
WRITE_ONCE(dio->submit.waiter, NULL);
blk_wake_io_task(waiter);
- } else if (dio->flags & IOMAP_DIO_WRITE) {
+ } else {
struct inode *inode = file_inode(dio->iocb->ki_filp);
WRITE_ONCE(dio->iocb->private, NULL);
- INIT_WORK(&dio->aio.work, iomap_dio_complete_work);
- queue_work(inode->i_sb->s_dio_done_wq, &dio->aio.work);
- } else {
- WRITE_ONCE(dio->iocb->private, NULL);
- iomap_dio_complete_work(&dio->aio.work);
+ if (dio->flags & IOMAP_DIO_WRITE &&
+ (inode->i_mapping->nrpages > 0) {
+ INIT_WORK(&dio->aio.work,
+ iomap_dio_complete_work);
+ queue_work(inode->i_sb->s_dio_done_wq,
+ &dio->aio.work);
+ } else {
+ iomap_dio_complete_work(&dio->aio.work);
+ }
}
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists