linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] quota: remove unused function put_dquot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0c3a4a8c-4f39-dd12-b98c-28805120b846@huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 29 Jun 2023 20:18:24 +0800
From:   Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
To:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
CC:     <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <yi.zhang@...wei.com>,
        <yangerkun@...wei.com>, <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>,
        <yukuai3@...wei.com>, Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] quota: remove unused function put_dquot_list()

On 2023/6/29 19:05, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 28-06-23 21:21:55, Baokun Li wrote:
>> Now that no one is calling put_dquot_list(), remove it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
> I guess you can merge this with patch 6. When there was only a single user,
> there's no good reason to separate the removal of the unused function...
>
> 								Honza
I got a warning when I compiled after I finished patch 6, and then there was
this patch. I will merge this patch into patch 6 in the next version.
>> ---
>>   fs/quota/dquot.c | 20 --------------------
>>   1 file changed, 20 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/quota/dquot.c b/fs/quota/dquot.c
>> index df028fb2ce72..ba0125473be3 100644
>> --- a/fs/quota/dquot.c
>> +++ b/fs/quota/dquot.c
>> @@ -1102,26 +1102,6 @@ static void remove_inode_dquot_ref(struct inode *inode, int type)
>>   	dqput(dquot);
>>   }
>>   
>> -/*
>> - * Free list of dquots
>> - * Dquots are removed from inodes and no new references can be got so we are
>> - * the only ones holding reference
>> - */
>> -static void put_dquot_list(struct list_head *tofree_head)
>> -{
>> -	struct list_head *act_head;
>> -	struct dquot *dquot;
>> -
>> -	act_head = tofree_head->next;
>> -	while (act_head != tofree_head) {
>> -		dquot = list_entry(act_head, struct dquot, dq_free);
>> -		act_head = act_head->next;
>> -		/* Remove dquot from the list so we won't have problems... */
>> -		list_del_init(&dquot->dq_free);
>> -		dqput(dquot);
>> -	}
>> -}
>> -
>>   static void remove_dquot_ref(struct super_block *sb, int type)
>>   {
>>   	struct inode *inode;
>> -- 
>> 2.31.1
>>
Thanks!
-- 
With Best Regards,
Baokun Li
.