[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230802103422.lzgb7yyksfbpw4rh@quack3>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 12:34:22 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix the time handling macros when ext4 is using
small inodes
On Tue 18-07-23 13:31:59, Jeff Layton wrote:
> If ext4 is using small on-disk inodes, then it may not be able to store
> fine grained timestamps. It also can't store the i_crtime at all in that
> case since that fully lives in the extended part of the inode.
>
> 979492850abd got the EXT4_EINODE_{GET,SET}_XTIME macros wrong, and would
> still store the tv_sec field of the i_crtime into the raw_inode, even
> when they were small, corrupting adjacent memory.
>
> This fixes those macros to skip setting anything in the raw_inode if the
> tv_sec field doesn't fit, and to properly return a {0,0} timestamp when
> the raw_inode doesn't support it.
>
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> Fixes: 979492850abd ("ext4: convert to ctime accessor functions")
> Reported-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
I've seen Christian has already folded this fixup so I just want to say:
Thanks for fixing this up while I was away!
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists