[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230802154131.2221419-6-hch@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 17:41:24 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>,
Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@...il.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 05/12] ext4: make the IS_EXT2_SB/IS_EXT3_SB checks more robust
Check for sb->s_type which is the right place to look at the file system
type, not the holder, which is just an implementation detail in the VFS
helpers.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
---
fs/ext4/super.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index c94ebf704616e5..193d665813b611 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static struct file_system_type ext2_fs_type = {
};
MODULE_ALIAS_FS("ext2");
MODULE_ALIAS("ext2");
-#define IS_EXT2_SB(sb) ((sb)->s_bdev->bd_holder == &ext2_fs_type)
+#define IS_EXT2_SB(sb) ((sb)->s_type == &ext2_fs_type)
#else
#define IS_EXT2_SB(sb) (0)
#endif
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static struct file_system_type ext3_fs_type = {
};
MODULE_ALIAS_FS("ext3");
MODULE_ALIAS("ext3");
-#define IS_EXT3_SB(sb) ((sb)->s_bdev->bd_holder == &ext3_fs_type)
+#define IS_EXT3_SB(sb) ((sb)->s_type == &ext3_fs_type)
static inline void __ext4_read_bh(struct buffer_head *bh, blk_opf_t op_flags,
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists