lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230803141336.23ce6xams3x333hd@quack3>
Date:   Thu, 3 Aug 2023 16:13:36 +0200
From:   Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:     Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...weicloud.com>
Cc:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu,
        adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, jack@...e.cz, yi.zhang@...wei.com,
        chengzhihao1@...wei.com, yukuai3@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] jbd2: move load_superblock() into
 journal_init_common()

On Tue 04-07-23 21:42:23, Zhang Yi wrote:
> From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
> 
> Moving the call to load_superblock() from jbd2_journal_load() and
  ^^ Move

> jbd2_journal_wipe() eraly into journal_init_common(), the journal
                      ^^^ early

> superblock gets read and the in-memory jounal_t structure gets
					  ^^ journal_t

> initialised after calling jbd2_journal_init_{dev,inode}, it's safe to
> do following initialization according to it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>

Otherwise the patch looks good to me. Feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>

								Honza

> ---
>  fs/jbd2/journal.c | 16 +++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/jbd2/journal.c b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
> index 48c44c7fccf4..b247d374e7a6 100644
> --- a/fs/jbd2/journal.c
> +++ b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
> @@ -1582,6 +1582,10 @@ static journal_t *journal_init_common(struct block_device *bdev,
>  	journal->j_sb_buffer = bh;
>  	journal->j_superblock = (journal_superblock_t *)bh->b_data;
>  
> +	err = load_superblock(journal);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto err_cleanup;
> +
>  	journal->j_shrink_transaction = NULL;
>  	journal->j_shrinker.scan_objects = jbd2_journal_shrink_scan;
>  	journal->j_shrinker.count_objects = jbd2_journal_shrink_count;
> @@ -2056,13 +2060,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(jbd2_journal_update_sb_errno);
>  int jbd2_journal_load(journal_t *journal)
>  {
>  	int err;
> -	journal_superblock_t *sb;
> -
> -	err = load_superblock(journal);
> -	if (err)
> -		return err;
> -
> -	sb = journal->j_superblock;
> +	journal_superblock_t *sb = journal->j_superblock;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * If this is a V2 superblock, then we have to check the
> @@ -2521,10 +2519,6 @@ int jbd2_journal_wipe(journal_t *journal, int write)
>  
>  	J_ASSERT (!(journal->j_flags & JBD2_LOADED));
>  
> -	err = load_superblock(journal);
> -	if (err)
> -		return err;
> -
>  	if (!journal->j_tail)
>  		goto no_recovery;
>  
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ