lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20230812024145.GD971@sol.localdomain> Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 19:41:45 -0700 From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org> To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...e.de> Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org, tytso@....edu, jaegeuk@...nel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/10] libfs: Validate negative dentries in case-insensitive directories On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 08:41:42PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote: > + /* > + * Filesystems will call into d_revalidate without setting > + * LOOKUP_ flags even for file creation (see lookup_one* > + * variants). Reject negative dentries in this case, since we > + * can't know for sure it won't be used for creation. > + */ > + if (!flags) > + return 0; > + > + /* > + * If the lookup is for creation, then a negative dentry can > + * only be reused if it's a case-sensitive match, not just a > + * case-insensitive one. This is needed to make the new file be > + * created with the name the user specified, preserving case. > + */ > + if (flags & (LOOKUP_CREATE | LOOKUP_RENAME_TARGET)) { > + /* > + * ->d_name won't change from under us in the creation > + * path only, since d_revalidate during creation and > + * renames is always called with the parent inode > + * locked. It isn't the case for all lookup callpaths, > + * so ->d_name must not be touched outside > + * (LOOKUP_CREATE|LOOKUP_RENAME_TARGET) context. > + */ > + if (dentry->d_name.len != name->len || > + memcmp(dentry->d_name.name, name->name, name->len)) > + return 0; > + } This is still really confusing to me. Can you consider the below? The code is the same except for the reordering, but the explanation is reworked to be much clearer (IMO). Anything I am misunderstanding? /* * If the lookup is for creation, then a negative dentry can only be * reused if it's a case-sensitive match, not just a case-insensitive * one. This is needed to make the new file be created with the name * the user specified, preserving case. * * LOOKUP_CREATE or LOOKUP_RENAME_TARGET cover most creations. In these * cases, ->d_name is stable and can be compared to 'name' without * taking ->d_lock because the caller holds dir->i_rwsem for write. * (This is because the directory lock blocks the dentry from being * concurrently instantiated, and negative dentries are never moved.) * * All other creations actually use flags==0. These come from the edge * case of filesystems calling functions like lookup_one() that do a * lookup without setting the lookup flags at all. Such lookups might * or might not be for creation, and if not don't guarantee stable * ->d_name. Therefore, invalidate all negative dentries when flags==0. */ if (flags & (LOOKUP_CREATE | LOOKUP_RENAME_TARGET)) { if (dentry->d_name.len != name->len || memcmp(dentry->d_name.name, name->name, name->len)) return 0; } if (!flags) return 0;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists