lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 23 Aug 2023 19:05:24 +0200
From:   Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:     Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
Cc:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu,
        adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, jack@...e.cz, darrick.wong@...cle.com,
        yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com, yukuai3@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e2fsck: delay quotas loading in release_orphan_inodes()

On Thu 17-08-23 16:18:28, Baokun Li wrote:
> After 7d79b40b ("e2fsck: adjust quota counters when clearing orphaned
> inodes"), we load all the quotas before we process the orphaned inodes,
> and when we load the quotas, we check the checsum of the bbitmap for each
> group. If one of the bbitmap checksums is wrong, the following error will
> be reported:
> 
> “Error initializing quota context in support library:
>  Block bitmap checksum does not match bitmap”
> 
> But loading quotas comes before checking the current superblock for the
> EXT2_ERROR_FS flag, which makes it impossible to use e2fsck to repair any
> image that contains orphan inodes and has the wrong bbitmap checksum.
> So delaying quota loading until after the EXT2_ERROR_FS judgment avoids
> the above problem.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>

This certainly looks better but I wonder if there still isn't a problem if
the bitmap checksums are wrong but EXT2_ERROR_FS is not set. Shouldn't we
rather move the initialization of the quota files after the call to
e2fsck_read_bitmaps()?

								Honza

> ---
>  e2fsck/super.c | 21 +++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/e2fsck/super.c b/e2fsck/super.c
> index 9495e029..b1aaaed6 100644
> --- a/e2fsck/super.c
> +++ b/e2fsck/super.c
> @@ -503,15 +503,6 @@ static int release_orphan_inodes(e2fsck_t ctx)
>  	    !ext2fs_has_feature_orphan_present(fs->super))
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	clear_problem_context(&pctx);
> -	ino = fs->super->s_last_orphan;
> -	pctx.ino = ino;
> -	pctx.errcode = e2fsck_read_all_quotas(ctx);
> -	if (pctx.errcode) {
> -		fix_problem(ctx, PR_0_QUOTA_INIT_CTX, &pctx);
> -		return 1;
> -	}
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * Win or lose, we won't be using the head of the orphan inode
>  	 * list again.
> @@ -525,10 +516,16 @@ static int release_orphan_inodes(e2fsck_t ctx)
>  	 * be running a full e2fsck run anyway... We clear orphan file contents
>  	 * after filesystem is checked to avoid clearing someone else's data.
>  	 */
> -	if (fs->super->s_state & EXT2_ERROR_FS) {
> -		if (ctx->qctx)
> -			quota_release_context(&ctx->qctx);
> +	if (fs->super->s_state & EXT2_ERROR_FS)
>  		return 0;
> +
> +	clear_problem_context(&pctx);
> +	ino = fs->super->s_last_orphan;
> +	pctx.ino = ino;
> +	pctx.errcode = e2fsck_read_all_quotas(ctx);
> +	if (pctx.errcode) {
> +		fix_problem(ctx, PR_0_QUOTA_INIT_CTX, &pctx);
> +		return 1;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (ino && ((ino < EXT2_FIRST_INODE(fs->super)) ||
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ