[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230825135431.1317785-21-hao.xu@linux.dev>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 21:54:22 +0800
From: Hao Xu <hao.xu@...ux.dev>
To: io-uring@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Stefan Roesch <shr@...com>, Clay Harris <bugs@...ycon.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-cachefs@...hat.com,
ecryptfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, codalist@...a.cs.cmu.edu,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...ts.orangefs.org, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
samba-technical@...ts.samba.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>
Subject: [PATCH 20/29] xfs: distinguish error type of memory allocation failure for nowait case
From: Hao Xu <howeyxu@...cent.com>
Previously, if we fail to get the memory we need, -ENOMEM is returned.
It can be -EAGAIN now since we support nowait now. Return the latter
when it is the case. Involved functions are: _xfs_buf_map_pages(),
xfs_buf_get_maps(), xfs_buf_alloc_kmem() and xfs_buf_alloc_pages().
Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <howeyxu@...cent.com>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
index 8b800ce28996..a6e6e64ff940 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ xfs_buf_get_maps(
bp->b_maps = kmem_zalloc(map_count * sizeof(struct xfs_buf_map),
KM_NOFS);
if (!bp->b_maps)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ return bp->b_flags & XBF_NOWAIT ? -EAGAIN : -ENOMEM;
return 0;
}
@@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ xfs_buf_alloc_kmem(
bp->b_addr = kmem_alloc(size, kmflag_mask);
if (!bp->b_addr)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ return flags & XBF_NOWAIT ? -EAGAIN : -ENOMEM;
if (((unsigned long)(bp->b_addr + size - 1) & PAGE_MASK) !=
((unsigned long)bp->b_addr & PAGE_MASK)) {
@@ -363,6 +363,7 @@ xfs_buf_alloc_pages(
{
gfp_t gfp_mask = __GFP_NOWARN;
long filled = 0;
+ bool nowait = flags & XBF_NOWAIT;
if (flags & XBF_READ_AHEAD)
gfp_mask |= __GFP_NORETRY;
@@ -377,7 +378,7 @@ xfs_buf_alloc_pages(
bp->b_pages = kzalloc(sizeof(struct page *) * bp->b_page_count,
gfp_mask);
if (!bp->b_pages)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ return nowait ? -EAGAIN : -ENOMEM;
}
bp->b_flags |= _XBF_PAGES;
@@ -451,7 +452,7 @@ _xfs_buf_map_pages(
memalloc_nofs_restore(nofs_flag);
if (!bp->b_addr)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ return flags & XBF_NOWAIT ? -EAGAIN : -ENOMEM;
}
return 0;
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists