linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v6 10/11] ext4: add first unit test for ext4_mb_new_blocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 01 Sep 2023 19:59:53 +0530
From:   Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@...il.com>
To:     Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>, tytso@....edu,
        adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 10/11] ext4: add first unit test for ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple in mballoc

Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com> writes:

> Here are prepared work:
> 1. Include mballoc-test.c to mballoc.c to be able test static function
> in mballoc.c.
> 2. Implement static stub to avoid read IO to disk.
> 3. Construct fake super_block. Only partial members are set, more members
> will be set when more functions are tested.
> Then unit test for ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple is added.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
> ---
>  fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c | 322 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  fs/ext4/mballoc.c      |   4 +
>  2 files changed, 326 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c


Thanks for working on the review comments. The purpose of functions and
structures are much clear now. Also the approach of including
mballoc-test.c within #ifdef macros inside mballoc.c looks ok to me.

Nice work in getting this ready! 
ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple() is a good first start (even though as of now
it is a simple allocator for fast commit replay path)

-ritesh