lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <87tts63d3w.fsf@doe.com>
Date:   Thu, 07 Sep 2023 08:26:35 +0530
From:   Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@...il.com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Zorro Lang <zlang@...nel.org>,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, fstests@...r.kernel.org,
        regressions@...ts.linux.dev,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [fstests generic/388, 455, 475, 482 ...] Ext4 journal recovery test fails

Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> writes:

> On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 01:38:23PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> > Is this code path a possibility, which can cause above logs?
>> > 
>> >    ptr = jbd2_alloc() -> kmem_cache_alloc()
>> >    <..>
>> >    new_folio = virt_to_folio(ptr)
>> >    new_offset = offset_in_folio(new_folio, ptr)
>> > 
>> > And then I am still not sure what the problem really is? 
>> > Is it because at the time of checkpointing, the path is still not fully
>> > converted to folio?
>> 
>> Oh yikes!  I didn't know that the allocation might come from kmalloc!
>> Yes, slab might use high-order allocations.  I'll have to look through
>> this and figure out what the problem might be.
>
> I think the probable cause is bh_offset().  Before these patches, if
> we allocated a buffer at offset 9kB into an order-2 slab, we'd fill in
> b_page with the third page of the slab and calculate bh_offset as 1kB.
> With these patches, we set b_page to the first page of the slab, and
> bh_offset still comes back as 1kB so we read from / write to entirely
> the wrong place.
>
> With this redefinition of bh_offset(), we calculate the offset relative
> to the base page if it's a tail page, and relative to the folio if it's
> a folio.  Works out nicely ;-)

Thanks Matthew for explaining the problem clearly.


>
> I have three other things I'm trying to debug right now, so this isn't
> tested, but if you have time you might want to give it a run.

sure, I gave it a try.

>
> diff --git a/include/linux/buffer_head.h b/include/linux/buffer_head.h
> index 6cb3e9af78c9..dc8fcdc40e95 100644
> --- a/include/linux/buffer_head.h
> +++ b/include/linux/buffer_head.h
> @@ -173,7 +173,10 @@ static __always_inline int buffer_uptodate(const struct buffer_head *bh)
>  	return test_bit_acquire(BH_Uptodate, &bh->b_state);
>  }
>  
> -#define bh_offset(bh)		((unsigned long)(bh)->b_data & ~PAGE_MASK)
> +static inline unsigned long bh_offset(struct buffer_head *bh)
> +{
> +	return (unsigned long)(bh)->b_data & (page_size(bh->b_page) - 1);
> +}
>  
>  /* If we *know* page->private refers to buffer_heads */
>  #define page_buffers(page)					\


I used "const" for bh to avoid warnings from fs/nilfs/alloc.c

diff --git a/include/linux/buffer_head.h b/include/linux/buffer_head.h
index 4ede47649a81..b61fa79cb7f5 100644
--- a/include/linux/buffer_head.h
+++ b/include/linux/buffer_head.h
@@ -171,7 +171,10 @@ static __always_inline int buffer_uptodate(const struct buffer_head *bh)
        return test_bit_acquire(BH_Uptodate, &bh->b_state);
 }

-#define bh_offset(bh)          ((unsigned long)(bh)->b_data & ~PAGE_MASK)
+static inline unsigned long bh_offset(const struct buffer_head *bh)
+{
+       return (unsigned long)(bh)->b_data & (page_size(bh->b_page) - 1);
+}

 /* If we *know* page->private refers to buffer_heads */
 #define page_buffers(page)                                     \


But this change alone was still giving me failures. On looking into
usage of b_data, I found we use offset_in_page() instead of bh_offset()
in jbd2. So I added below changes in fs/jbd2 to replace offset_in_page()
to bh_offset()...

diff --git a/fs/jbd2/commit.c b/fs/jbd2/commit.c
index 1073259902a6..0c25640714ac 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/commit.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/commit.c
@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static __u32 jbd2_checksum_data(__u32 crc32_sum, struct buffer_head *bh)

        addr = kmap_atomic(page);
        checksum = crc32_be(crc32_sum,
-               (void *)(addr + offset_in_page(bh->b_data)), bh->b_size);
+               (void *)(addr + bh_offset(bh)), bh->b_size);
        kunmap_atomic(addr);

        return checksum;
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ static void jbd2_block_tag_csum_set(journal_t *j, journal_block_tag_t *tag,
        seq = cpu_to_be32(sequence);
        addr = kmap_atomic(page);
        csum32 = jbd2_chksum(j, j->j_csum_seed, (__u8 *)&seq, sizeof(seq));
-       csum32 = jbd2_chksum(j, csum32, addr + offset_in_page(bh->b_data),
+       csum32 = jbd2_chksum(j, csum32, addr + bh_offset(bh),
                             bh->b_size);
        kunmap_atomic(addr);

diff --git a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
index 4d1fda1f7143..2ac57f7a242d 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
@@ -942,7 +942,7 @@ static void jbd2_freeze_jh_data(struct journal_head *jh)

        J_EXPECT_JH(jh, buffer_uptodate(bh), "Possible IO failure.\n");
        page = bh->b_page;
-       offset = offset_in_page(bh->b_data);
+       offset = bh_offset(bh);
        source = kmap_atomic(page);
        /* Fire data frozen trigger just before we copy the data */
        jbd2_buffer_frozen_trigger(jh, source + offset, jh->b_triggers);


With all of above diffs, here are the results.

ext4/1k: 15 tests, 1 failures, 1709 seconds
  generic/455  Pass     43s
  generic/475  Pass     128s
  generic/482  Pass     183s
  generic/455  Pass     43s
  generic/475  Pass     134s
  generic/482  Pass     191s
  generic/455  Pass     41s
  generic/475  Pass     139s
  generic/482  Pass     135s
  generic/455  Pass     46s
  generic/475  Pass     132s
  generic/482  Pass     146s
  generic/455  Pass     47s
  generic/475  Failed   145s
  generic/482  Pass     156s
Totals: 15 tests, 0 skipped, 1 failures, 0 errors, 1709s

I guess the above failure (generic/475) could be due to it's flakey
behaviour which Ted was mentioning.


Now, while we are at it, I think we should also make change to reiserfs from
offset_in_page() to bh_offset()

diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/journal.c b/fs/reiserfs/journal.c
index 015bfe4e4524..23411ec163d4 100644
--- a/fs/reiserfs/journal.c
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/journal.c
@@ -4217,7 +4217,7 @@ static int do_journal_end(struct reiserfs_transaction_handle *th, int flags)
                        page = cn->bh->b_page;
                        addr = kmap(page);
                        memcpy(tmp_bh->b_data,
-                              addr + offset_in_page(cn->bh->b_data),
+                              addr + bh_offset(cn->bh),
                               cn->bh->b_size);
                        kunmap(page);
                        mark_buffer_dirty(tmp_bh);


I will also run "auto" group with ext4/1k with all of above change. Will
update the results once it is done.


-ritesh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ