[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230918213643.GA1945@templeofstupid.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 14:36:43 -0700
From: Krister Johansen <kjlx@...pleofstupid.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
Cc: Krister Johansen <kjlx@...pleofstupid.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [e2fsprogs PATCH v2] resize2fs: use directio when reading
superblock
Hi Andreas,
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 03:20:01PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Sep 11, 2023, at 12:39 PM, Krister Johansen <kjlx@...pleofstupid.com> wrote:
> >
> > Invocations of resize2fs intermittently report failure due to superblock
> > checksum mismatches in this author's environment. This might happen a few
> > times a week. The following script can make this happen within minutes.
> > (It assumes /dev/nvme1n1 is available and not in use by anything else).
>
> Krister,
> thanks for submitting the patch. This particular issue was already fixed
> in commit v1.46.6-16-g43a498e93888, apparently based on your previous report:
>
> commit 43a498e938887956f393b5e45ea6ac79cc5f4b84
> Author: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
> AuthorDate: Thu Jun 15 00:17:01 2023 -0400
> Commit: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
> CommitDate: Thu Jun 15 00:17:01 2023 -0400
>
> resize2fs: use Direct I/O when reading the superblock for online resizes
>
> If the file system is mounted, the superblock can be changing while
> resize2fs is trying to read the superblock, resulting in checksum
> failures. One way of avoiding this problem is read the superblock
> using Direct I/O, since the kernel makes sure that what gets written
> to disk is self-consistent.
>
> Suggested-by: Krister Johansen <kjlx@...pleofstupid.com>
> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
>
> So it is landed on the e2fsprogs maint branch, but there has not been a
> maintenance release since the patch was landed.
Thanks for the response. My apologies for resubmitting this. I had
thought that I checked the git trees before sending this out, but I
must've looked at the wrong one. Sorry about that.
Thanks to Ted for applying his reworked patch, it's much appreciated.
-K
Powered by blists - more mailing lists