[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230919120532.5dg7mgdnwd5lezgz@quack3>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 14:05:32 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Matthew Bobrowski <mbobrowski@...browski.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [bug report] ext4 misses final i_size meta sync under O_DIRECT |
O_SYNC semantics after iomap DIO conversion
Hello!
On Tue 19-09-23 14:00:04, Gao Xiang wrote:
> Our consumer reports a behavior change between pre-iomap and iomap
> direct io conversion:
>
> If the system crashes after an appending write to a file open with
> O_DIRECT | O_SYNC flag set, file i_size won't be updated even if
> O_SYNC was marked before.
>
> It can be reproduced by a test program in the attachment with
> gcc -o repro repro.c && ./repro testfile && echo c > /proc/sysrq-trigger
>
> After some analysis, we found that before iomap direct I/O conversion,
> the timing was roughly (taking Linux 3.10 codebase as an example):
>
> ..
> - ext4_file_dio_write
> - __generic_file_aio_write
> ..
> - ext4_direct_IO # generic_file_direct_write
> - ext4_ext_direct_IO
> - ext4_ind_direct_IO # final_size > inode->i_size
> - ..
> - ret = blockdev_direct_IO()
> - i_size_write(inode, end) # orphan && ret > 0 &&
> # end > inode->i_size
> - ext4_mark_inode_dirty()
> - ...
> - generic_write_sync # handling O_SYNC
>
> So the dirty inode meta will be committed into journal immediately
> if O_SYNC is set. However, After commit 569342dc2485 ("ext4: move
> inode extension/truncate code out from ->iomap_end() callback"),
> the new behavior seems as below:
>
> ..
> - ext4_dio_write_iter
> - ext4_dio_write_checks # extend = 1
> - iomap_dio_rw
> - __iomap_dio_rw
> - iomap_dio_complete
> - generic_write_sync
> - ext4_handle_inode_extension # extend = 1
>
> So that i_size will be recorded only after generic_write_sync() is
> called. So O_SYNC won't flush the update i_size to the disk.
Indeed, that looks like a bug. Thanks for report!
> On the other side, after a quick look of XFS side, it will record
> i_size changes in xfs_dio_write_end_io() so it seems that it doesn't
> have this problem.
Yes, I'm a bit hazy on the details but I think we've decided to call
ext4_handle_inode_extension() directly from ext4_dio_write_iter() because
from ext4_dio_write_end_io() it was difficult to test in a race-free way
whether extending i_size (and i_disksize) is needed or not (we don't
necessarily hold i_rwsem there). I'll think how we could fix the problem
you've reported.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists