[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZS/pVp9I4M8p4vwh@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 15:19:02 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, gfs2@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-ntfs-dev@...ts.sourceforge.net,
ntfs3@...ts.linux.dev, ocfs2-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/27] buffer: Return bool from grow_dev_folio()
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 04:41:44AM +0900, Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 5:11 AM Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> >
> > Rename grow_dev_page() to grow_dev_folio() and make it return a bool.
> > Document what that bool means; it's more subtle than it first appears.
> > Also rename the 'failed' label to 'unlock' beacuse it's not exactly
> > 'failed'. It just hasn't succeeded.
>
> This changes the return type of grow_buffers() from "int" to "bool".
> But, it seems that the caller, __getblk_slow(), has not changed the
> type of the variable "ret" that receives its return value:
[...]
>
> So, it looks like the error check immediately after calling
> grow_buffers() will not branch like before.
> Is this okay ? Or, am I missing some other changes?
>
> Also, there is a typo in the changelog: "beacuse" -> "because".
Argh, yes. Andrew, please drop this patch for now. I'll submit
something better next cycle.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists