[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231025153135.kfnldzle3rglmfvp@awork3.anarazel.de>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 08:31:35 -0700
From: Andres Freund <andres@...razel.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>,
Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@...labora.com>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Ricardo CaƱuelo <ricardo.canuelo@...labora.com>,
gustavo.padovan@...labora.com, zsm@...gle.com, garrick@...gle.com,
Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
io-uring@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: task hung in ext4_fallocate #2
Hi,
On 2023-10-24 18:34:05 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Yeah I'm going to do a revert of the io_uring side, which effectively
> disables it. Then a revised series can be done, and when done, we could
> bring it back.
I'm queueing a test to confirm that the revert actually fixes things. Is there
still benefit in testing your other patch in addition upstream?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
Powered by blists - more mailing lists