[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d3b87b87-2ca7-43ca-9fb4-ee3696561eb5@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 16:09:47 +0900
From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>, hch@...radead.org,
ming.lei@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk, roger.pau@...rix.com, colyli@...e.de,
kent.overstreet@...il.com, joern@...ybastard.org, miquel.raynal@...tlin.com,
richard@....at, vigneshr@...com, sth@...ux.ibm.com, hoeppner@...ux.ibm.com,
hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com,
jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com, clm@...com,
josef@...icpanda.com, dsterba@...e.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
brauner@...nel.org, nico@...xnic.net, xiang@...nel.org, chao@...nel.org,
tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, agruenba@...hat.com, jack@...e.com,
konishi.ryusuke@...il.com, dchinner@...hat.com, linux@...ssschuh.net,
min15.li@...sung.com, yukuai3@...wei.com, willy@...radead.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hare@...e.de, p.raghav@...sung.com
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
gfs2@...ts.linux.dev, linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org, yi.zhang@...wei.com,
yangerkun@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH block/for-next v2 07/16] bcachefs: use new helper to get
inode from block_device
On 11/27/23 15:21, Yu Kuai wrote:
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
>
> Which is more efficiency, and also prepare to remove the field
> 'bd_inode' from block_device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
> ---
> fs/bcachefs/util.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/util.h b/fs/bcachefs/util.h
> index 2984b57b2958..fe7ccb3a3517 100644
> --- a/fs/bcachefs/util.h
> +++ b/fs/bcachefs/util.h
> @@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ int bch2_bio_alloc_pages(struct bio *, size_t, gfp_t);
>
> static inline sector_t bdev_sectors(struct block_device *bdev)
> {
> - return bdev->bd_inode->i_size >> 9;
> + return bdev_inode(bdev)->i_size >> 9;
shouldn't this use i_size_read() ?
I missed the history with this but why not use bdev_nr_sectors() and delete this
helper ?
> }
>
> #define closure_bio_submit(bio, cl) \
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
Powered by blists - more mailing lists