lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 16:55:29 -0500
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To: Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, willy@...radead.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ritesh.list@...il.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yi.zhang@...wei.com,
        yangerkun@...wei.com, yukuai3@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -RFC 0/2] mm/ext4: avoid data corruption when extending
 DIO write race with buffered read

On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 09:19:03PM +0800, Baokun Li wrote:
> Thank you very much for your detailed explanation!
> But the downstream users do have buffered reads to read the relay log
> file, as I confirmed with bpftrace. Here's an introduction to turning on
> relay logging, but I'm not sure if you can access this link:
> https://blog.csdn.net/javaanddonet/article/details/112596148

Well, if a mysql-supplied program is trying read the relay log using a
buffered read, when it's being written using Direct I/O, that's a bug
in mysql, and it should be reported as such to the mysql folks.

It does look like there is a newer way of doing replication which
doesn't rely on messign with log files.   From:

    https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.0/en/replication.html

    MySQL 8.0 supports different methods of replication. The
    traditional method is based on replicating events from the
    source's binary log, and requires the log files and positions in
    them to be synchronized between source and replica. The newer
    method based on global transaction identifiers (GTIDs) is
    transactional and therefore does not require working with log
    files or positions within these files, which greatly simplifies
    many common replication tasks. Replication using GTIDs guarantees
    consistency between source and replica as long as all transactions
    committed on the source have also been applied on the replica. For
    more information about GTIDs and GTID-based replication in MySQL,
    see Section 17.1.3, “Replication with Global Transaction
    Identifiers”. For information on using binary log file position
    based replication, see Section 17.1, “Configuring Replication”.

Perhaps you can try and see how mysql handles GTID-based replication
using bpftrace?

Cheers,

						- Ted

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ