linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH -next RFC 00/14] block: don't access bd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4b11a311-c121-1f44-0ccf-a3966a396994@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 14:06:33 +0800
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, roger.pau@...rix.com, colyli@...e.de,
 kent.overstreet@...il.com, joern@...ybastard.org, miquel.raynal@...tlin.com,
 richard@....at, vigneshr@...com, sth@...ux.ibm.com, hoeppner@...ux.ibm.com,
 hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com,
 jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com, clm@...com,
 josef@...icpanda.com, dsterba@...e.com, nico@...xnic.net, xiang@...nel.org,
 chao@...nel.org, tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
 agruenba@...hat.com, jack@...e.com, konishi.ryusuke@...il.com,
 willy@...radead.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hare@...e.de,
 p.raghav@...sung.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
 linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
 gfs2@...ts.linux.dev, linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org, yi.zhang@...wei.com,
 yangerkun@...wei.com, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next RFC 00/14] block: don't access bd_inode directly
 from other modules

Hi,

在 2023/12/06 13:54, Christoph Hellwig 写道:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 08:37:14PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
>> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
>>
>> Patch 1 add some bdev apis, then follow up patches will use these apis
>> to avoid access bd_inode directly, and hopefully the field bd_inode can
>> be removed eventually(after figure out a way for fs/buffer.c).
> 
> What tree is this against?  It fails to apply to either Jens'
> for-6.8/block or Linus tree in the very first patch.

It was against linux-next branch, for the tag next-20231201, because I'm
not sure yet if this patchset should be applied to Jans' tree. Please
let me know if I should swith wo Jens' tree for v2.

Thanks,
Kuai
> 
> .
>