| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ZXAhA0WUXoF5YEq4@infradead.org> Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 23:21:39 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, axboe@...nel.dk, roger.pau@...rix.com, colyli@...e.de, kent.overstreet@...il.com, joern@...ybastard.org, miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, richard@....at, vigneshr@...com, sth@...ux.ibm.com, hoeppner@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com, clm@...com, josef@...icpanda.com, dsterba@...e.com, nico@...xnic.net, xiang@...nel.org, chao@...nel.org, tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, agruenba@...hat.com, jack@...e.com, konishi.ryusuke@...il.com, willy@...radead.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hare@...e.de, p.raghav@...sung.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, gfs2@...ts.linux.dev, linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org, yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH -next RFC 02/14] xen/blkback: use bdev api in xen_update_blkif_status() On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 02:56:05PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote: > > > - invalidate_inode_pages2( > > > - blkif->vbd.bdev_handle->bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping); > > > + invalidate_bdev(blkif->vbd.bdev_handle->bdev); > > > > blkbak is a bdev exported. I don't think it should ever call > > invalidate_inode_pages2, through a wrapper or not. > > I'm not sure about this. I'm not familiar with xen/blkback, but I saw > that xen-blkback will open a bdev from xen_vbd_create(), hence this > looks like a dm/md for me, hence it sounds reasonable to sync + > invalidate the opened bdev while initialization. Please kindly correct > me if I'm wrong. I guess we have enough precedence for this, so the switchover here isn't wrong. But all this invalidating of the bdev cache seems to be asking for trouble.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists