[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 05:16:54 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, roger.pau@...rix.com, colyli@...e.de,
kent.overstreet@...il.com, joern@...ybastard.org,
miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, richard@....at, vigneshr@...com,
sth@...ux.ibm.com, hoeppner@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
gor@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, clm@...com, josef@...icpanda.com,
dsterba@...e.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org,
nico@...xnic.net, xiang@...nel.org, chao@...nel.org, tytso@....edu,
adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, agruenba@...hat.com, jack@...e.com,
konishi.ryusuke@...il.com, willy@...radead.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, p.raghav@...sung.com, hare@...e.de,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
gfs2@...ts.linux.dev, linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org,
yukuai3@...wei.com, yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 for-6.8/block 01/18] block: add some bdev apis
> +void invalidate_bdev_range(struct block_device *bdev, pgoff_t start,
> + pgoff_t end)
> +{
> + invalidate_mapping_pages(bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping, start, end);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(invalidate_bdev_range);
Can we have kerneldoc comments for the new helpers please?
> +struct folio *__bdev_get_folio(struct block_device *bdev, loff_t pos,
> + fgf_t fgp_flags, gfp_t gfp)
> +{
> + return __filemap_get_folio(bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping, pos >> PAGE_SHIFT,
> + fgp_flags, gfp);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__bdev_get_folio);
It's a bit silly to have a __-prefixed API without a version that
doesn't have the prefix, so I'd prefer to drop it. Unless willy has
a good argument for keeping it the same as the filemap API.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists