linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH RFC v2 for-6.8/block 01/18] block: add some bdev apis

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 09:10:05 +0800
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>, axboe@...nel.dk, roger.pau@...rix.com,
 colyli@...e.de, kent.overstreet@...il.com, joern@...ybastard.org,
 miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, richard@....at, vigneshr@...com,
 sth@...ux.ibm.com, hoeppner@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
 gor@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
 martin.petersen@...cle.com, clm@...com, josef@...icpanda.com,
 dsterba@...e.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org,
 nico@...xnic.net, xiang@...nel.org, chao@...nel.org, tytso@....edu,
 adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, agruenba@...hat.com, jack@...e.com,
 konishi.ryusuke@...il.com, willy@...radead.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
 p.raghav@...sung.com, hare@...e.de, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
 linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org,
 linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, gfs2@...ts.linux.dev,
 linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org, yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com,
 "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 for-6.8/block 01/18] block: add some bdev apis

Hi,

在 2023/12/12 21:14, Christoph Hellwig 写道:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 05:52:17PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
>>> +void bdev_associated_mapping(struct block_device *bdev,
>>> +			     struct address_space *mapping)
>>> +{
>>> +	mapping->host = bdev->bd_inode;
>>> +}
>>
>> Here I'm not sure - is the helper really a win? It seems a bit obscure to
>> me. This initialization of another mapping for a bdev looks really special.
> 
> If we want to hide bd_inode we'll something like this helper even if
> I don't particularly like it either.
> 
> But it might be a good idea to move out of this series and into the
> follow on removing bd_inode, as it's rather pointless without that
> context.

Yes, this sounds good, I'll remove this from v3.

Thanks,
Kuai

> .
>