[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231219230029.GG38652@quark.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 16:00:29 -0700
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...e.de>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jaegeuk@...nel.org, tytso@....edu,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] fscrypt: Drop d_revalidate if key is available
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 04:16:02PM -0500, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> fscrypt dentries are always valid once the key is available. Since the
> key cannot be removed without evicting the dentry, we don't need to keep
> retrying to revalidate it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...e.de>
IIUC, this patch minimizes the overhead of fscrypt_d_revalidate() both for
encrypted and unencrypted dentries. That's what's needed (seeing as this series
makes fscrypt_d_revalidate be installed on unencrypted dentries), but the commit
message only mentions the encrypted case. It would be helpful to mention both.
> ---
> fs/crypto/fname.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/crypto/fname.c b/fs/crypto/fname.c
> index 7b3fc189593a..0457ba2d7d76 100644
> --- a/fs/crypto/fname.c
> +++ b/fs/crypto/fname.c
> @@ -591,8 +591,15 @@ int fscrypt_d_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int flags)
> * reverting to no-key names without evicting the directory's inode
> * -- which implies eviction of the dentries in the directory.
> */
> - if (!(dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_NOKEY_NAME))
> + if (!(dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_NOKEY_NAME)) {
> + /*
> + * If fscrypt is the only feature requiring
> + * revalidation for this dentry, we can just disable it.
> + */
> + if (dentry->d_op->d_revalidate == &fscrypt_d_revalidate)
No need for the & in &fscrypt_d_revalidate.
- Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists