| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20231221150558.2740823-9-libaokun1@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 23:05:58 +0800
From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
To: <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <tytso@....edu>, <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, <jack@...e.cz>,
<ritesh.list@...il.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<yi.zhang@...wei.com>, <yangerkun@...wei.com>, <yukuai3@...wei.com>,
<libaokun1@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 8/8] ext4: mark the group block bitmap as corrupted before reporting an error
Otherwise unlocking the group in ext4_grp_locked_error may allow other
processes to modify the core block bitmap that is known to be corrupt.
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
---
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index b862ca2750fd..c43eefebdaa3 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -564,14 +564,14 @@ static void mb_free_blocks_double(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_buddy *e4b,
blocknr = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, e4b->bd_group);
blocknr += EXT4_C2B(EXT4_SB(sb), first + i);
+ ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted(sb, e4b->bd_group,
+ EXT4_GROUP_INFO_BBITMAP_CORRUPT);
ext4_grp_locked_error(sb, e4b->bd_group,
inode ? inode->i_ino : 0,
blocknr,
"freeing block already freed "
"(bit %u)",
first + i);
- ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted(sb, e4b->bd_group,
- EXT4_GROUP_INFO_BBITMAP_CORRUPT);
}
mb_clear_bit(first + i, e4b->bd_info->bb_bitmap);
}
@@ -1926,14 +1926,13 @@ static void mb_free_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_buddy *e4b,
blocknr = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, e4b->bd_group);
blocknr += EXT4_C2B(sbi, block);
if (!(sbi->s_mount_state & EXT4_FC_REPLAY)) {
+ ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted(sb, e4b->bd_group,
+ EXT4_GROUP_INFO_BBITMAP_CORRUPT);
ext4_grp_locked_error(sb, e4b->bd_group,
inode ? inode->i_ino : 0,
blocknr,
"freeing already freed block (bit %u); block bitmap corrupt.",
block);
- ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted(
- sb, e4b->bd_group,
- EXT4_GROUP_INFO_BBITMAP_CORRUPT);
} else {
mb_regenerate_buddy(e4b);
goto check;
@@ -2410,12 +2409,12 @@ void ext4_mb_simple_scan_group(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
k = mb_find_next_zero_bit(buddy, max, 0);
if (k >= max) {
+ ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted(ac->ac_sb,
+ e4b->bd_group,
+ EXT4_GROUP_INFO_BBITMAP_CORRUPT);
ext4_grp_locked_error(ac->ac_sb, e4b->bd_group, 0, 0,
"%d free clusters of order %d. But found 0",
grp->bb_counters[i], i);
- ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted(ac->ac_sb,
- e4b->bd_group,
- EXT4_GROUP_INFO_BBITMAP_CORRUPT);
break;
}
ac->ac_found++;
@@ -2466,12 +2465,12 @@ void ext4_mb_complex_scan_group(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
* free blocks even though group info says we
* have free blocks
*/
+ ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted(sb, e4b->bd_group,
+ EXT4_GROUP_INFO_BBITMAP_CORRUPT);
ext4_grp_locked_error(sb, e4b->bd_group, 0, 0,
"%d free clusters as per "
"group info. But bitmap says 0",
free);
- ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted(sb, e4b->bd_group,
- EXT4_GROUP_INFO_BBITMAP_CORRUPT);
break;
}
@@ -2497,12 +2496,12 @@ void ext4_mb_complex_scan_group(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
if (WARN_ON(ex.fe_len <= 0))
break;
if (free < ex.fe_len) {
+ ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted(sb, e4b->bd_group,
+ EXT4_GROUP_INFO_BBITMAP_CORRUPT);
ext4_grp_locked_error(sb, e4b->bd_group, 0, 0,
"%d free clusters as per "
"group info. But got %d blocks",
free, ex.fe_len);
- ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted(sb, e4b->bd_group,
- EXT4_GROUP_INFO_BBITMAP_CORRUPT);
/*
* The number of free blocks differs. This mostly
* indicate that the bitmap is corrupt. So exit
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists