lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20240103102821.448134-3-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 18:28:14 +0800 From: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com> To: tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, jack@...e.cz Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 2/9] ext4: remove unused parameter group in ext4_mb_choose_next_group_*() Remove unused parameter group in ext4_mb_choose_next_group_*(). Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> --- fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c index 9f9b8dd06..765b62729 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c @@ -870,7 +870,7 @@ mb_update_avg_fragment_size(struct super_block *sb, struct ext4_group_info *grp) * cr level needs an update. */ static void ext4_mb_choose_next_group_p2_aligned(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, - enum criteria *new_cr, ext4_group_t *group, ext4_group_t ngroups) + enum criteria *new_cr, ext4_group_t *group) { struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb); struct ext4_group_info *iter; @@ -944,7 +944,7 @@ ext4_mb_find_good_group_avg_frag_lists(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, int o * order. Updates *new_cr if cr level needs an update. */ static void ext4_mb_choose_next_group_goal_fast(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, - enum criteria *new_cr, ext4_group_t *group, ext4_group_t ngroups) + enum criteria *new_cr, ext4_group_t *group) { struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb); struct ext4_group_info *grp = NULL; @@ -989,7 +989,7 @@ static void ext4_mb_choose_next_group_goal_fast(struct ext4_allocation_context * * much and fall to CR_GOAL_LEN_SLOW in that case. */ static void ext4_mb_choose_next_group_best_avail(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, - enum criteria *new_cr, ext4_group_t *group, ext4_group_t ngroups) + enum criteria *new_cr, ext4_group_t *group) { struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb); struct ext4_group_info *grp = NULL; @@ -1124,11 +1124,11 @@ static void ext4_mb_choose_next_group(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, } if (*new_cr == CR_POWER2_ALIGNED) { - ext4_mb_choose_next_group_p2_aligned(ac, new_cr, group, ngroups); + ext4_mb_choose_next_group_p2_aligned(ac, new_cr, group); } else if (*new_cr == CR_GOAL_LEN_FAST) { - ext4_mb_choose_next_group_goal_fast(ac, new_cr, group, ngroups); + ext4_mb_choose_next_group_goal_fast(ac, new_cr, group); } else if (*new_cr == CR_BEST_AVAIL_LEN) { - ext4_mb_choose_next_group_best_avail(ac, new_cr, group, ngroups); + ext4_mb_choose_next_group_best_avail(ac, new_cr, group); } else { /* * TODO: For CR=2, we can arrange groups in an rb tree sorted by -- 2.30.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists