linux-ext4 - [PATCH v3 2/9] ext4: remove unused parameter ngroup in ext4_mb_choose_next_group

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240105092102.496631-3-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Fri,  5 Jan 2024 17:20:55 +0800
From: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
To: tytso@....edu,
	adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
	jack@...e.cz,
	ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/9] ext4: remove unused parameter ngroup in ext4_mb_choose_next_group_*()

Remove unused parameter ngroup in ext4_mb_choose_next_group_*().

Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>
---
 fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index 9f9b8dd06..765b62729 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -870,7 +870,7 @@ mb_update_avg_fragment_size(struct super_block *sb, struct ext4_group_info *grp)
  * cr level needs an update.
  */
 static void ext4_mb_choose_next_group_p2_aligned(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
-			enum criteria *new_cr, ext4_group_t *group, ext4_group_t ngroups)
+			enum criteria *new_cr, ext4_group_t *group)
 {
 	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb);
 	struct ext4_group_info *iter;
@@ -944,7 +944,7 @@ ext4_mb_find_good_group_avg_frag_lists(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, int o
  * order. Updates *new_cr if cr level needs an update.
  */
 static void ext4_mb_choose_next_group_goal_fast(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
-		enum criteria *new_cr, ext4_group_t *group, ext4_group_t ngroups)
+		enum criteria *new_cr, ext4_group_t *group)
 {
 	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb);
 	struct ext4_group_info *grp = NULL;
@@ -989,7 +989,7 @@ static void ext4_mb_choose_next_group_goal_fast(struct ext4_allocation_context *
  * much and fall to CR_GOAL_LEN_SLOW in that case.
  */
 static void ext4_mb_choose_next_group_best_avail(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
-		enum criteria *new_cr, ext4_group_t *group, ext4_group_t ngroups)
+		enum criteria *new_cr, ext4_group_t *group)
 {
 	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb);
 	struct ext4_group_info *grp = NULL;
@@ -1124,11 +1124,11 @@ static void ext4_mb_choose_next_group(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
 	}
 
 	if (*new_cr == CR_POWER2_ALIGNED) {
-		ext4_mb_choose_next_group_p2_aligned(ac, new_cr, group, ngroups);
+		ext4_mb_choose_next_group_p2_aligned(ac, new_cr, group);
 	} else if (*new_cr == CR_GOAL_LEN_FAST) {
-		ext4_mb_choose_next_group_goal_fast(ac, new_cr, group, ngroups);
+		ext4_mb_choose_next_group_goal_fast(ac, new_cr, group);
 	} else if (*new_cr == CR_BEST_AVAIL_LEN) {
-		ext4_mb_choose_next_group_best_avail(ac, new_cr, group, ngroups);
+		ext4_mb_choose_next_group_best_avail(ac, new_cr, group);
 	} else {
 		/*
 		 * TODO: For CR=2, we can arrange groups in an rb tree sorted by
-- 
2.30.0