lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <01b2c55a334cf970e49958a5f932d5822bfa74b4.camel@interlinx.bc.ca>
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2024 07:52:33 -0500
From: "Brian J. Murrell" <brian@...erlinx.bc.ca>
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: e2scrub finds corruption immediately after mounting
On Thu, 2024-01-04 at 09:13 -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-01-03 at 20:55 -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > Curious. Normally e2scrub will run e2fsck twice: Once in journal-
> > only
> > preen mode to replay the journal, then again with -fy to perform
> > the
> > full filesystem (snapshot) check.
>
> It is doing that. I suspect the first e2fsck is silent.
>
> > I wonder if you would paste the output of
> > "bash -x e2scrub /dev/rootvol_tmp/almalinux8_opt" here? I'd be
> > curious
> > to see what the command flow is.
>
> Sure.
Was the bash -x output useful in any way, or was any of the information
I supplied in my other replies on this list:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/51aa3ceea05945c9f28e884bc2f43a249ef7e23e.camel@interlinx.bc.ca/
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/be5e8488f8484194889216603d2aba2812c6adcb.camel@interlinx.bc.ca/
useful including the test of 1.47.0 being able to reproduce the
behaviour?
Any thoughts on how to proceed?
Cheers,
b.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists