[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240112133958.pgxs3gl33g5hf7pn@dell-per750-06-vm-08.rhts.eng.pek2.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 21:39:58 +0800
From: Zorro Lang <zlang@...hat.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc: Zorro Lang <zlang@...nel.org>, fstests@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] xfstests: test custom crypto data unit size
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 07:54:44PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 02:39:05PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > This series adds a test that verifies the on-disk format of encrypted
> > files that use a crypto data unit size that differs from the filesystem
> > block size. This tests the functionality that was introduced in Linux
> > 6.7 by kernel commit 5b1188847180 ("fscrypt: support crypto data unit
> > size less than filesystem block size").
>
> Hi Zorro, can you consider applying this series? It's been out for review for
> 3 months, so I don't think reviews are going to come in. The prerequisite
> xfsprogs patch is already present on the for-next branch of xfsprogs.
Sure Eric, I thought about this patchset last week, I saw that xfsprogs
patchset has been merge. I'll give this patchset a basic test, to make
sure it won't break xfstests, then merge it.
Thanks, and sorry this late.
Zorro
>
> Thanks!
>
> - Eric
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists