lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20240116010422.217925-18-sashal@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 20:03:55 -0500 From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org Cc: Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.7 18/21] ext4: fix inconsistent between segment fstrim and full fstrim From: Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com> [ Upstream commit 68da4c44b994aea797eb9821acb3a4a36015293e ] Suppose we issue two FITRIM ioctls for ranges [0,15] and [16,31] with mininum length of trimmed range set to 8 blocks. If we have say a range of blocks 10-22 free, this range will not be trimmed because it straddles the boundary of the two FITRIM ranges and neither part is big enough. This is a bit surprising to some users that call FITRIM on smaller ranges of blocks to limit impact on the system. Also XFS trims all free space extents that overlap with the specified range so we are inconsistent among filesystems. Let's change ext4_try_to_trim_range() to consider for trimming the whole free space extent that straddles the end of specified range, not just the part of it within the range. Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231216010919.1995851-1-yebin10@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> --- fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 11 ++++++++--- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c index d72b5e3c92ec..d195461123d8 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c @@ -6753,13 +6753,15 @@ static int ext4_try_to_trim_range(struct super_block *sb, __acquires(ext4_group_lock_ptr(sb, e4b->bd_group)) __releases(ext4_group_lock_ptr(sb, e4b->bd_group)) { - ext4_grpblk_t next, count, free_count; + ext4_grpblk_t next, count, free_count, last, origin_start; bool set_trimmed = false; void *bitmap; + last = ext4_last_grp_cluster(sb, e4b->bd_group); bitmap = e4b->bd_bitmap; - if (start == 0 && max >= ext4_last_grp_cluster(sb, e4b->bd_group)) + if (start == 0 && max >= last) set_trimmed = true; + origin_start = start; start = max(e4b->bd_info->bb_first_free, start); count = 0; free_count = 0; @@ -6768,7 +6770,10 @@ __releases(ext4_group_lock_ptr(sb, e4b->bd_group)) start = mb_find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, max + 1, start); if (start > max) break; - next = mb_find_next_bit(bitmap, max + 1, start); + + next = mb_find_next_bit(bitmap, last + 1, start); + if (origin_start == 0 && next >= last) + set_trimmed = true; if ((next - start) >= minblocks) { int ret = ext4_trim_extent(sb, start, next - start, e4b); -- 2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists