linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v11 14/26] locking/lockdep, cpu/hotplus: Use a weaker annotation in AP thread

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <871q9hlnl2.ffs@tglx>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 16:16:41 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel_team@...ynix.com,
 torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com,
 linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
 linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
 will@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, joel@...lfernandes.org,
 sashal@...nel.org, daniel.vetter@...ll.ch, duyuyang@...il.com,
 johannes.berg@...el.com, tj@...nel.org, tytso@....edu,
 willy@...radead.org, david@...morbit.com, amir73il@...il.com,
 gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, kernel-team@....com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
 akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mhocko@...nel.org, minchan@...nel.org,
 hannes@...xchg.org, vdavydov.dev@...il.com, sj@...nel.org,
 jglisse@...hat.com, dennis@...nel.org, cl@...ux.com, penberg@...nel.org,
 rientjes@...gle.com, vbabka@...e.cz, ngupta@...are.org,
 linux-block@...r.kernel.org, josef@...icpanda.com,
 linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jack@...e.cz,
 jlayton@...nel.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com, hch@...radead.org,
 djwong@...nel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
 rodrigosiqueiramelo@...il.com, melissa.srw@...il.com,
 hamohammed.sa@...il.com, 42.hyeyoo@...il.com, chris.p.wilson@...el.com,
 gwan-gyeong.mun@...el.com, max.byungchul.park@...il.com,
 boqun.feng@...il.com, longman@...hat.com, hdanton@...a.com,
 her0gyugyu@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 14/26] locking/lockdep, cpu/hotplus: Use a weaker
 annotation in AP thread

On Tue, Jan 30 2024 at 11:58, Byungchul Park wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 06:30:02PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 24 2024 at 20:59, Byungchul Park wrote:
>> 
>> Why is lockdep in the subsystem prefix here? You are changing the CPU
>> hotplug (not hotplus) code, right?
>> 
>> > cb92173d1f0 ("locking/lockdep, cpu/hotplug: Annotate AP thread") was
>> > introduced to make lockdep_assert_cpus_held() work in AP thread.
>> >
>> > However, the annotation is too strong for that purpose. We don't have to
>> > use more than try lock annotation for that.
>> 
>> This lacks a proper explanation why this is too strong.
>> 
>> > Furthermore, now that Dept was introduced, false positive alarms was
>> > reported by that. Replaced it with try lock annotation.
>> 
>> I still have zero idea what this is about.
>
> 1. can track PG_locked that is a potential deadlock trigger.
>
>    https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1674268856-31807-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com/

Sure, but that wants to be explicitely explained in the changelog and
not with a link. 'Now that Dept was introduced ...' is not an
explanation.

Thanks,

        tglx