linux-ext4 - Re: Why isn't ext2 deprecated over ext4?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e1b38f63-d942-4f8e-be2a-9c18206c70ed@thelounge.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:33:32 +0100
From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@...lounge.net>
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why isn't ext2 deprecated over ext4?



Am 21.02.24 um 10:33 schrieb Michael Opdenacker:
> Greetings
> 
> I'm wondering why ext2 isn't marked as deprecated yet as it has 32 bit 
> dates and dates will rollover in 2038 (in 14 years from now!).
> 
> I'm asking because ext4, when used without a journal, seems to be a 
> worthy replacement and has 64 bit dates.
> 
> I'll be happy to send a patch to fs/ext2/Kconfig to warn users.

even ext4 on very small filesystems has 32 bit days

at least in 2019 a fresh 50 MB filesystem welcomed me at first mount 
that it will only last until 2038 - i don't find the mail in my archives 
but the response on the kernel-list was "add these and that params" 
after i asked if someone is kidding me