| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAJfpegvdt_FDpsgJ5hb8r48r-NoxUn38p=-EoFoV5un7Hm4hpg@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 11:21:37 +0100 From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/13] fuse: fix UAF in rcu pathwalks On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 at 11:18, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com> wrote: > If you move fuse_backing_files_free() to the start of the function, > I think merge conflict will be avoided: Yeah, but I don't think it's worth messing with this just to avoid a conflict. Thanks, Miklos
Powered by blists - more mailing lists