[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wmpn74u0.fsf@camandro.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:16:55 +0000
From: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...ux.dev>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Ext4 Developers List
<linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH e2fsprogs] e2fsck: update quota accounting after
directory optimization
Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca> writes:
> On Mar 27, 2024, at 9:43 AM, Luis Henriques (SUSE) <luis.henriques@...ux.dev> wrote:
>>
>> In "Pass 3A: Optimizing directories", a directory may have it's size reduced.
>> If that happens and quota is enabled in the filesystem, the quota information
>> will be incorrect because it doesn't take the rehash into account.
>>
>> This patch simply updates the quota data accordingly, after the directory is
>> written and it's size has been updated.
>
> Hi Luis,
> thanks for the patch. It looks reasonable, and might (partially) explain
> why quota accounting occasionally reports inconsistencies by a few blocks
> after running e2fsck. You can add my Reviewed-by: to the patch.
Awesome, thank you for your review. In the meantime, I have already a
similar fix for another case where quota inconsistencies occur in e2fsck.
I'm still running a few more tests, but I should be sending another patch
soon.
> Could you please include an e2fsck regression test for this, to confirm
> that it is working and continues to work in the future? It should be
> possible to use something like the following to create a test case:
>
> # cd tests
> # make testnew
> # tune2fs -O quota,project f_testnew/image
> # mkdir /mnt/tmp
> # mount -t ext4 -o loop f_testnew/image /mnt/tmp
> # mkdir /mnt/tmp/subdir
> # chattr -p 1000 -P /mnt/tmp/subdir
> # touch /mnt/tmp/subdir/long-filenames-for-test-{1..1024}
> # rm /mnt/tmp/subdir/long-filenames-for-test-{1..1024..2}
> # umount /mnt/tmp
> # echo "directory optimization updates quota" > f_testnew/name
> # make testend
> # mv f_testnew f_quota_shrinkdir
>
> and confirm in expect.[12] that the quota did not need to be repaired
> afterward by e2fsck (i.e. there shouldn't be any error messages about
> inconsistent quota). Running this test with an unpatched e2fsck should
> report that the quotas had to be fixed and the test should fail.
Right, it makes sense to add a regression test, of course. I'll need to
get familiar with the framework used but I'll have a look and see what I
can come up with.
> On a related note, it would be convenient if "make testnew" passed an
> environment variable (e.g. $TESTNEW_OPTS) to mke2fs so more options
> could be set at format time instead of using tune2fs afterward:
>
> # TESTNEW_OPTS="-O quota,project" make testnew
>
> It isn't a big deal in this case, but might be useful in the future.
Hmm... Okay, as I said I'll need to get familiar with this but that seems
to make sense.
Cheers,
--
Luis
> Cheers, Andreas
>
>> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218626
>> Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques (SUSE) <luis.henriques@...ux.dev>
>> ---
>> e2fsck/rehash.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/e2fsck/rehash.c b/e2fsck/rehash.c
>> index c1da7d52724e..4847d172e5fe 100644
>> --- a/e2fsck/rehash.c
>> +++ b/e2fsck/rehash.c
>> @@ -987,14 +987,18 @@ errcode_t e2fsck_rehash_dir(e2fsck_t ctx, ext2_ino_t ino,
>> {
>> ext2_filsys fs = ctx->fs;
>> errcode_t retval;
>> - struct ext2_inode inode;
>> + struct ext2_inode_large inode;
>> char *dir_buf = 0;
>> struct fill_dir_struct fd = { NULL, NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL,
>> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 };
>> struct out_dir outdir = { 0, 0, 0, 0 };
>> - struct name_cmp_ctx name_cmp_ctx = {0, NULL};
>> + struct name_cmp_ctx name_cmp_ctx = {0, NULL};
>> + __u64 osize;
>>
>> - e2fsck_read_inode(ctx, ino, &inode, "rehash_dir");
>> + e2fsck_read_inode_full(ctx, ino, EXT2_INODE(&inode),
>> + sizeof(inode), "rehash_dir");
>> +
>> + osize = EXT2_I_SIZE(&inode);
>>
>> if (ext2fs_has_feature_inline_data(fs->super) &&
>> (inode.i_flags & EXT4_INLINE_DATA_FL))
>> @@ -1013,7 +1017,7 @@ errcode_t e2fsck_rehash_dir(e2fsck_t ctx, ext2_ino_t ino,
>> fd.ino = ino;
>> fd.ctx = ctx;
>> fd.buf = dir_buf;
>> - fd.inode = &inode;
>> + fd.inode = EXT2_INODE(&inode);
>> fd.dir = ino;
>> if (!ext2fs_has_feature_dir_index(fs->super) ||
>> (inode.i_size / fs->blocksize) < 2)
>> @@ -1092,14 +1096,25 @@ resort:
>> goto errout;
>> }
>>
>> - retval = write_directory(ctx, fs, &outdir, ino, &inode, fd.compress);
>> + retval = write_directory(ctx, fs, &outdir, ino, EXT2_INODE(&inode),
>> + fd.compress);
>> if (retval)
>> goto errout;
>>
>> + if ((osize > EXT2_I_SIZE(&inode)) &&
>> + (ino != quota_type2inum(PRJQUOTA, fs->super)) &&
>> + (ino != fs->super->s_orphan_file_inum) &&
>> + (ino == EXT2_ROOT_INO || ino >= EXT2_FIRST_INODE(ctx->fs->super)) &&
>> + !(inode.i_flags & EXT4_EA_INODE_FL)) {
>> + quota_data_sub(ctx->qctx, &inode,
>> + ino, osize - EXT2_I_SIZE(&inode));
>> + }
>> +
>> if (ctx->options & E2F_OPT_CONVERT_BMAP)
>> retval = e2fsck_rebuild_extents_later(ctx, ino);
>> else
>> - retval = e2fsck_check_rebuild_extents(ctx, ino, &inode, pctx);
>> + retval = e2fsck_check_rebuild_extents(ctx, ino,
>> + EXT2_INODE(&inode), pctx);
>> errout:
>> ext2fs_free_mem(&dir_buf);
>> ext2fs_free_mem(&fd.harray);
>>
>
>
> Cheers, Andreas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists