[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240411122530.GQ5383@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 09:25:30 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>, peterx@...hat.com
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, david@...morbit.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
jhubbard@...dia.com, rcampbell@...dia.com, willy@...radead.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, jack@...e.cz, djwong@...nel.org,
hch@....de, david@...hat.com, ruansy.fnst@...itsu.com,
nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, jglisse@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 02/10] mm/hmm: Remove dead check for HugeTLB and FS DAX
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 10:57:23AM +1000, Alistair Popple wrote:
> pud_huge() returns true only for a HugeTLB page. pud_devmap() is only
> used by FS DAX pages. These two things are mutually exclusive so this
> code is dead code and can be removed.
I'm not sure this is true.. pud_huge() is mostly a misspelling of pud_leaf()..
> - if (pud_huge(pud) && pud_devmap(pud)) {
I suspect this should be written as:
if (pud_leaf(pud) && pud_devmap(pud)) {
In line with Peter's work here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20240321220802.679544-1-peterx@redhat.com/
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists