[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZhfvT6SXfCR60NAG@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 15:10:23 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, david@...morbit.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
jhubbard@...dia.com, rcampbell@...dia.com, jgg@...dia.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, jack@...e.cz, djwong@...nel.org,
hch@....de, david@...hat.com, ruansy.fnst@...itsu.com,
nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, jglisse@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 07/10] mm: Allow compound zone device pages
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 10:57:28AM +1000, Alistair Popple wrote:
> Supporting compound zone device pages requires compound_head() to
> distinguish between head and tail pages whilst still preserving the
> special struct page fields that are specific to zone device pages.
>
> A tail page is distinguished by having bit zero being set in
> page->compound_head, with the remaining bits pointing to the head
> page. For zone device pages page->compound_head is shared with
> page->pgmap.
>
> The page->pgmap field is common to all pages within a memory section.
> Therefore pgmap is the same for both head and tail pages and we can
> use the same scheme to distinguish tail pages. To obtain the pgmap for
> a tail page a new accessor is introduced to fetch it from
> compound_head.
Would it make sense at this point to move pgmap and zone_device_data
from struct page to struct folio? That will make any forgotten
places fail to compile instead of getting a bogus value.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists