lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4c263b90-6226-c2bf-f3e5-3b15cd576aa7@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 20:28:25 +0800
From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
To: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
CC: <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<tytso@....edu>, <jack@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] jbd2: remove unnedded "need_copy_out" in
 jbd2_journal_write_metadata_buffer

On 2024/5/6 22:17, Kemeng Shi wrote:
> As we only need to copy out when we should do escape, need_copy_out
> could be simply replaced by "do_escape".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>

Make sense, looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>

> ---
>  fs/jbd2/journal.c | 7 ++-----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/jbd2/journal.c b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
> index 068031f35aea..9a35d0c5b38c 100644
> --- a/fs/jbd2/journal.c
> +++ b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
> @@ -327,7 +327,6 @@ int jbd2_journal_write_metadata_buffer(transaction_t *transaction,
>  				  struct buffer_head **bh_out,
>  				  sector_t blocknr)
>  {
> -	int need_copy_out = 0;
>  	int done_copy_out = 0;
>  	int do_escape = 0;
>  	char *mapped_data;
> @@ -382,16 +381,14 @@ int jbd2_journal_write_metadata_buffer(transaction_t *transaction,
>  	/*
>  	 * Check for escaping
>  	 */
> -	if (*((__be32 *)mapped_data) == cpu_to_be32(JBD2_MAGIC_NUMBER)) {
> -		need_copy_out = 1;
> +	if (*((__be32 *)mapped_data) == cpu_to_be32(JBD2_MAGIC_NUMBER))
>  		do_escape = 1;
> -	}
>  	kunmap_local(mapped_data);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Do we need to do a data copy?
>  	 */
> -	if (need_copy_out && !done_copy_out) {
> +	if (do_escape && !done_copy_out) {
>  		char *tmp;
>  
>  		spin_unlock(&jh_in->b_state_lock);
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ