linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v16 3/9] libfs: Introduce case-insensitive string comparison helper

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240510013330.GI1110919@google.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 01:33:30 +0000
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...labora.com>
Cc: tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	jaegeuk@...nel.org, chao@...nel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel@...labora.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org,
	jack@...e.cz, krisman@...e.de,
	Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 3/9] libfs: Introduce case-insensitive string
 comparison helper

On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 03:13:26PM +0300, Eugen Hristev wrote:
> +/**
> + * generic_ci_match() - Match a name (case-insensitively) with a dirent.
> + * This is a filesystem helper for comparison with directory entries.
> + * generic_ci_d_compare should be used in VFS' ->d_compare instead.
> + *
> + * @parent: Inode of the parent of the dirent under comparison
> + * @name: name under lookup.
> + * @folded_name: Optional pre-folded name under lookup
> + * @de_name: Dirent name.
> + * @de_name_len: dirent name length.
> + *
> + * Test whether a case-insensitive directory entry matches the filename
> + * being searched.  If @folded_name is provided, it is used instead of
> + * recalculating the casefold of @name.
> + *
> + * Return: > 0 if the directory entry matches, 0 if it doesn't match, or
> + * < 0 on error.
> + */
> +int generic_ci_match(const struct inode *parent,
> +		     const struct qstr *name,
> +		     const struct qstr *folded_name,
> +		     const u8 *de_name, u32 de_name_len)
> +{
> +	const struct super_block *sb = parent->i_sb;
> +	const struct unicode_map *um = sb->s_encoding;
> +	struct fscrypt_str decrypted_name = FSTR_INIT(NULL, de_name_len);
> +	struct qstr dirent = QSTR_INIT(de_name, de_name_len);
> +	int res = 0;
> +
> +	if (IS_ENCRYPTED(parent)) {
> +		const struct fscrypt_str encrypted_name =
> +			FSTR_INIT((u8 *) de_name, de_name_len);
> +
> +		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!fscrypt_has_encryption_key(parent)))
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +
> +		decrypted_name.name = kmalloc(de_name_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!decrypted_name.name)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +		res = fscrypt_fname_disk_to_usr(parent, 0, 0, &encrypted_name,
> +						&decrypted_name);
> +		if (res < 0)
> +			goto out;

If fscrypt_fname_disk_to_usr() returns an error and !sb_has_strict_encoding(sb),
then this function returns 0 (indicating no match) instead of the error code
(indicating an error).  Is that the correct behavior?  I would think that
strict_encoding should only have an effect on the actual name comparison.

> +	/*
> +	 * Attempt a case-sensitive match first. It is cheaper and
> +	 * should cover most lookups, including all the sane
> +	 * applications that expect a case-sensitive filesystem.
> +	 */
> +	if (folded_name->name) {
> +		if (dirent.len == folded_name->len &&
> +		    !memcmp(folded_name->name, dirent.name, dirent.len))
> +			goto out;
> +		res = utf8_strncasecmp_folded(um, folded_name, &dirent);

Shouldn't the memcmp be done with the original user-specified name, not the
casefolded name?  I would think that the user-specified name is the one that's
more likely to match the on-disk name, because of case preservation.  In most
cases users will specify the same case on both file creation and later access.

- Eric