lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240614204135.GI6125@frogsfrogsfrogs>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 13:41:35 -0700
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
To: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@...il.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
	Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: document the design of iomap and how to
 port

On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 08:31:55PM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> 
> > +SEEK_DATA
> > +---------
> > +
> > +The ``iomap_seek_data`` function implements the SEEK_DATA "whence" value
> > +for llseek.
> > +``IOMAP_REPORT`` will be passed as the ``flags`` argument to
> > +``->iomap_begin``.
> > +
> > +For unwritten mappings, the pagecache will be searched.
> > +Regions of the pagecache with a folio mapped and uptodate fsblocks
> > +within those folios will be reported as data areas.
> > +
> > +Callers commonly hold ``i_rwsem`` in shared mode.
> > +
> > +SEEK_HOLE
> > +---------
> > +
> > +The ``iomap_seek_hole`` function implements the SEEK_HOLE "whence" value
> > +for llseek.
> > +``IOMAP_REPORT`` will be passed as the ``flags`` argument to
> > +``->iomap_begin``.
> > +
> > +For unwritten mappings, the pagecache will be searched.
> > +Regions of the pagecache with no folio mapped, or a !uptodate fsblock
> > +within a folio will be reported as sparse hole areas.
> > +
> > +Callers commonly hold ``i_rwsem`` in shared mode.
> > +
> > +Swap File Activation
> > +--------------------
> > +
> > +The ``iomap_swapfile_activate`` function finds all the base-page aligned
> > +regions in a file and sets them up as swap space.
> > +The file will be ``fsync()``'d before activation.
> > +``IOMAP_REPORT`` will be passed as the ``flags`` argument to
> > +``->iomap_begin``.
> > +All mappings must be mapped or unwritten; cannot be dirty or shared, and
> > +cannot span multiple block devices.
> > +Callers must hold ``i_rwsem`` in exclusive mode; this is already
> > +provided by ``swapon``.
> > +
> > +Extent Map Reporting (FS_IOC_FIEMAP)
> > +------------------------------------
> > +
> > +The ``iomap_fiemap`` function exports file extent mappings to userspace
> > +in the format specified by the ``FS_IOC_FIEMAP`` ioctl.
> > +``IOMAP_REPORT`` will be passed as the ``flags`` argument to
> > +``->iomap_begin``.
> > +Callers commonly hold ``i_rwsem`` in shared mode.
> > +
> > +Block Map Reporting (FIBMAP)
> > +----------------------------
> > +
> > +``iomap_bmap`` implements FIBMAP.
> > +The calling conventions are the same as for FIEMAP.
> > +This function is only provided to maintain compatibility for filesystems
> > +that implemented FIBMAP prior to conversion.
> > +This ioctl is deprecated; do not add a FIBMAP implementation to
> > +filesystems that do not have it.
> > +Callers should probably hold ``i_rwsem`` in shared mode, but this is
> > +unclear.
> 
> looking at fiemap callers is also confusing w.r.t i_rwsem ;)

Yes indeed -- if the FIEMAP code does not access any state that's
protected only by i_rwsem then I guess you don't need it?  AFAICT that's
the case for xfs.

> > +
> > +Porting Guide
> > +=============
> > +
> > +Why Convert to iomap?
> > +---------------------
> > +
> > +There are several reasons to convert a filesystem to iomap:
> > +
> > + 1. The classic Linux I/O path is not terribly efficient.
> > +    Pagecache operations lock a single base page at a time and then call
> > +    into the filesystem to return a mapping for only that page.
> > +    Direct I/O operations build I/O requests a single file block at a
> > +    time.
> > +    This worked well enough for direct/indirect-mapped filesystems such
> > +    as ext2, but is very inefficient for extent-based filesystems such
> > +    as XFS.
> > +
> > + 2. Large folios are only supported via iomap; there are no plans to
> > +    convert the old buffer_head path to use them.
> > +
> > + 3. Direct access to storage on memory-like devices (fsdax) is only
> > +    supported via iomap.
> > +
> > + 4. Lower maintenance overhead for individual filesystem maintainers.
> > +    iomap handles common pagecache related operations itself, such as
> > +    allocating, instantiating, locking, and unlocking of folios.
> > +    No ->write_begin(), ->write_end() or direct_IO
> > +    address_space_operations are required to be implemented by
> > +    filesystem using iomap.
> > +
> > +How to Convert to iomap?
> > +------------------------
> > +
> > +First, add ``#include <linux/iomap.h>`` from your source code and add
> > +``select FS_IOMAP`` to your filesystem's Kconfig option.
> > +Build the kernel, run fstests with the ``-g all`` option across a wide
> > +variety of your filesystem's supported configurations to build a
> > +baseline of which tests pass and which ones fail.
> > +
> > +The recommended approach is first to implement ``->iomap_begin`` (and
> > +``->iomap->end`` if necessary) to allow iomap to obtain a read-only
> 
> small correction: ``->iomap_end``

Fixed, thanks.

> > +mapping of a file range.
> > +In most cases, this is a relatively trivial conversion of the existing
> > +``get_block()`` function for read-only mappings.
> > +``FS_IOC_FIEMAP`` is a good first target because it is trivial to
> > +implement support for it and then to determine that the extent map
> > +iteration is correct from userspace.
> > +If FIEMAP is returning the correct information, it's a good sign that
> > +other read-only mapping operations will do the right thing.
> > +
> > +Next, modify the filesystem's ``get_block(create = false)``
> > +implementation to use the new ``->iomap_begin`` implementation to map
> > +file space for selected read operations.
> > +Hide behind a debugging knob the ability to switch on the iomap mapping
> > +functions for selected call paths.
> > +It is necessary to write some code to fill out the bufferhead-based
> > +mapping information from the ``iomap`` structure, but the new functions
> > +can be tested without needing to implement any iomap APIs.
> > +
> > +Once the read-only functions are working like this, convert each high
> > +level file operation one by one to use iomap native APIs instead of
> > +going through ``get_block()``.
> > +Done one at a time, regressions should be self evident.
> > +You *do* have a regression test baseline for fstests, right?
> > +It is suggested to convert swap file activation, ``SEEK_DATA``, and
> > +``SEEK_HOLE`` before tackling the I/O paths.
> > +A likely complexity at this point will be converting the buffered read
> > +I/O path because of bufferheads.
> > +The buffered read I/O paths doesn't need to be converted yet, though the
> > +direct I/O read path should be converted in this phase.
> > +
> > +At this point, you should look over your ``->iomap_begin`` function.
> > +If it switches between large blocks of code based on dispatching of the
> > +``flags`` argument, you should consider breaking it up into
> > +per-operation iomap ops with smaller, more cohesive functions.
> > +XFS is a good example of this.
> > +
> > +The next thing to do is implement ``get_blocks(create == true)``
> > +functionality in the ``->iomap_begin``/``->iomap_end`` methods.
> > +It is strongly recommended to create separate mapping functions and
> > +iomap ops for write operations.
> > +Then convert the direct I/O write path to iomap, and start running fsx
> > +w/ DIO enabled in earnest on filesystem.
> > +This will flush out lots of data integrity corner case bugs that the new
> > +write mapping implementation introduces.
> > +
> > +Now, convert any remaining file operations to call the iomap functions.
> > +This will get the entire filesystem using the new mapping functions, and
> > +they should largely be debugged and working correctly after this step.
> > +
> > +Most likely at this point, the buffered read and write paths will still
> > +to be converted.
> > +The mapping functions should all work correctly, so all that needs to be
> > +done is rewriting all the code that interfaces with bufferheads to
> > +interface with iomap and folios.
> > +It is much easier first to get regular file I/O (without any fancy
> > +features like fscrypt, fsverity, compression, or data=journaling)
> > +converted to use iomap.
> > +Some of those fancy features (fscrypt and compression) aren't
> > +implemented yet in iomap.
> > +For unjournalled filesystems that use the pagecache for symbolic links
> > +and directories, you might also try converting their handling to iomap.
> > +
> > +The rest is left as an exercise for the reader, as it will be different
> > +for every filesystem.
> > +If you encounter problems, email the people and lists in
> > +``get_maintainers.pl`` for help.
> > +
> > +Bugs and Limitations
> > +====================
> > +
> > + * No support for fscrypt.
> > + * No support for compression.
> > + * No support for fsverity yet.
> > + * Strong assumptions that IO should work the way it does on XFS.
> > + * Does iomap *actually* work for non-regular file data?
> > +
> > +Patches welcome!
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index 8754ac2c259d..2ddd94d43ecf 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -8483,6 +8483,7 @@ R:	Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...nel.org>
> >  L:	linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org
> >  L:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
> >  S:	Supported
> > +F:	Documentation/filesystems/iomap.txt
> >  F:	fs/iomap/
> >  F:	include/linux/iomap.h
> >  
> 
> Rest looks good to me.

Yay, thanks for giving feedback on the whole thing!

--D

> -ritesh
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ