linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v6 0/9] fs: multigrain timestamp redux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240716-zerlegen-haudegen-ba86a22f4322@brauner>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 09:37:19 +0200
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, 
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, 
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@...cle.com>, 
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, 
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>, 
	David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, 
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, 
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>, 
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, 
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/9] fs: multigrain timestamp redux

On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 08:48:51AM GMT, Jeff Layton wrote:
> I think this is pretty much ready for linux-next now. Since the latest
> changes are pretty minimal, I've left the Reviewed-by's intact. It would
> be nice to have acks or reviews from maintainers for ext4 and tmpfs too.
> 
> I did try to plumb this into bcachefs too, but the way it handles
> timestamps makes that pretty difficult. It keeps the active copies in an
> internal representation of the on-disk inode and periodically copies
> them to struct inode. This is backward from the way most blockdev
> filesystems do this.
> 
> Christian, would you be willing to pick these up  with an eye toward
> v6.12 after the merge window settles?

Yup. About to queue it up. I'll try to find some time to go through it
so I might have some replies later but that shouldn't hold up linux-next
at all.