linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 1/7] ext4: avoid buffer_head leak in ext4_mark_inode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fec59d4d-898d-447c-b4fb-e9d055550f96@web.de>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 11:55:44 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
 Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] ext4: avoid buffer_head leak in ext4_mark_inode_used

> Release inode_bitmap_bh from ext4_read_inode_bitmap in
> ext4_mark_inode_used to avoid buffer_head leak.
> By the way, remove unneeded goto for invalid ino when inode_bitmap_bh
> is NULL.

1. I suggest to split such changes into separate update steps.
   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.11-rc3#n81

2. How do you think about to add any tags (like “Fixes” and “Cc”) accordingly?

3. Would you like to append parentheses to any function names?

Regards,
Markus