[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240829035627.GC4023@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 05:56:27 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@...cle.com>,
Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] xfs: refactor xfs_file_fallocate
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 01:11:11PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > +xfs_falloc_allocate_range(
> > + struct file *file,
> > + int mode,
> > + loff_t offset,
> > + loff_t len)
> > +{
> > + struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
> > + loff_t new_size = 0;
> > + int error;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * If always_cow mode we can't use preallocations and thus should not
> > + * create them.
> > + */
> > + if (xfs_is_always_cow_inode(XFS_I(inode)))
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> ... our preallocation operation always returns -EOPNOTSUPP for
> COW mode.
>
> Should the zeroing code also have this COW mode check in it after
> the hole punch has run so we don't do unnecessary prealloc there?
The low-level block allocation helper just returns early without
doing work (move a bit, but not changed in behavior earlier in the
series). So it won't actually do the prealloc.
>
> -Dave.
> --
> Dave Chinner
> david@...morbit.com
---end quoted text---
Powered by blists - more mailing lists