lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240830053739.3588573-5-zhangshida@kylinos.cn>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 13:37:39 +0800
From: zhangshida <starzhangzsd@...il.com>
To: tytso@....edu,
	adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
	jack@...e.com,
	ebiggers@...nel.org
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	zhangshida@...inos.cn,
	starzhangzsd@...il.com,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] ext4: remove the special buffer dirty handling in do_journal_get_write_access

From: Shida Zhang <zhangshida@...inos.cn>

This kinda revert the commit 56d35a4cd13e("ext4: Fix dirtying of
journalled buffers in data=journal mode") made by Jan 14 years ago,
since the do_get_write_access() itself can deal with the extra
unexpected buf dirting things in a proper way now.

Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Shida Zhang <zhangshida@...inos.cn>
---
 fs/ext4/inode.c | 18 +-----------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index a28f279fd02f..2687bf451a25 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -1023,27 +1023,11 @@ static int ext4_dirty_journalled_data(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh)
 int do_journal_get_write_access(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
 				struct buffer_head *bh)
 {
-	int dirty = buffer_dirty(bh);
-	int ret;
-
 	if (!buffer_mapped(bh) || buffer_freed(bh))
 		return 0;
-	/*
-	 * ext4_block_write_begin() could have dirtied some buffers. Clean
-	 * the dirty bit as jbd2_journal_get_write_access() could complain
-	 * otherwise about fs integrity issues. Setting of the dirty bit
-	 * by ext4_block_write_begin() isn't a real problem here as we clear
-	 * the bit before releasing a page lock and thus writeback cannot
-	 * ever write the buffer.
-	 */
-	if (dirty)
-		clear_buffer_dirty(bh);
 	BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "get write access");
-	ret = ext4_journal_get_write_access(handle, inode->i_sb, bh,
+	return ext4_journal_get_write_access(handle, inode->i_sb, bh,
 					    EXT4_JTR_NONE);
-	if (!ret && dirty)
-		ret = ext4_dirty_journalled_data(handle, bh);
-	return ret;
 }
 
 int ext4_block_write_begin(handle_t *handle, struct folio *folio,
-- 
2.33.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ