[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <628a0278-6809-4d2e-94f3-14a882bfa34b@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 15:52:01 +0800
From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
To: Li Zetao <lizetao1@...wei.com>, <tytso@....edu>,
<adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>
CC: <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] ext4: Remove redundant null pointer check
Hi Zetao,
On 2024/8/20 9:32, Li Zetao wrote:
> Since the ext4_find_extent() does not return a null pointer, the check for
> the null pointer here is redundant. Drop null pointer check for clean
> code.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@...wei.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/extents.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> index e067f2dd0335..12f0771d57d2 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> @@ -6112,7 +6112,7 @@ int ext4_ext_clear_bb(struct inode *inode)
> break;
> if (ret > 0) {
> path = ext4_find_extent(inode, map.m_lblk, NULL, 0);
> - if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(path)) {
> + if (!IS_ERR(path)) {
> for (j = 0; j < path->p_depth; j++) {
>
> ext4_mb_mark_bb(inode->i_sb,
Thanks for the cleanup patch.
But the change is already included in the patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240710040654.1714672-21-libaokun@huaweicloud.com/
Thanks,
Baokun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists