lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20240904102334.a2th4zv4szuae7by@quack3> Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 12:23:34 +0200 From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> To: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...weicloud.com> Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, jack@...e.cz, ritesh.list@...il.com, yi.zhang@...wei.com, chengzhihao1@...wei.com, yukuai3@...wei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/12] ext4: let __revise_pending() return newly inserted pendings On Wed 04-09-24 12:15:15, Jan Kara wrote: > On Tue 13-08-24 20:34:44, Zhang Yi wrote: > > From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com> > > > > Let __insert_pending() return 1 after successfully inserting a new > > pending cluster, and also let __revise_pending() to return the number of > > of newly inserted pendings. > > > > Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com> > > AFAICS nothing really uses this functionality in this version of the > patchset so we can drop this patch? Now I've realized patch 6 indeed uses the new return value in one place. This patch looks good so feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@...e.com> SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists